GPT-5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT-5.2 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 400K vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.2 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 23x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.2
Input
$1.75
Output
$14.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
16× cheaper
Output
$0.60
23× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 16× input, 23× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 9.2x more emoji
GPT-5.2
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
64%Vocabulary56%
16wSentence Length14w
0.34Hedging0.37
9.4Bold5.7
3.9Lists4.0
0.06Emoji0.54
0.89Headings0.70
0.31Transitions0.14
Based on 15 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
