MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare MiniMax M3 by MiniMax against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M3
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
2.7× cheaper
Output
$0.60
2.0× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 2.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
47%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 5.7x more transitions
MiniMax M3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
55%Vocabulary56%
24wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.37
5.2Bold5.7
3.0Lists4.0
1.15Emoji0.54
1.21Headings0.70
0.02Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
