GPT-5.2vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $0.15/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5.2 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.75/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $14/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 9.3x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.2
Input
$1.75
Output
$14.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
12× cheaper
Output
$1.50
9.3× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 12× input, 9.3× output.
Where to run it
4 hosts
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 15.8x more emoji
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
64%Vocabulary56%
16wSentence Length16w
0.34Hedging0.32
9.4Bold5.1
3.9Lists3.9
0.06Emoji0.92
0.89Headings0.75
0.31Transitions0.08
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
GPT-5.2 vs MercuryNew provider
GPT-5.2 vs Mercury 2New provider
GPT-5.2 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider