Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2vsSolar Pro 4
Updated Aug 2026

GPT-5.2vsSolar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $0.09/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 and Solar Pro 4 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2Solar Pro 4
Input price$1.75/M tokens$0.09/M tokens
Output price$14/M tokens$0.36/M tokens
Context window400K tokens524K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.2486 words
Recommendation, 12-month PT range, 2-sentence thesis Recommendation: SHORT LLLT 12-month PT range: $25–$42 (central $30) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality mid-market spend/AP SaaS business, but the stock embeds a valuation that requires durable >20% growth and sustained margin expansion well beyond our…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,052 words
INTERNAL MEMO – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE TO: IC Members FROM: Long/Short Equity Desk DATE: Oct 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation / Long Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $52–$58 (Base case ~$54, Bull ~$68, Bear ~$38) Thesis: LedgerLift is a structurally advantaged mid-market AP…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.2211 words
Pantry “Golden Garlic Butter Pasta” (7-Ingredient Comfort Bowl) A rich, glossy pasta with garlicky butter and a pop of chili—made entirely from common pantry staples.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4294 words
🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-5.2807 words
Below is a simple, beginner-friendly 1‑month plan built around 3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (Sleep + Stress). It’s designed to be practical, low-friction, and sustainable.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4859 words
Here’s a simple, progressive 1-month plan built around Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. Each week adds one small, beginner-friendly shift to each area. The goal isn’t perfection; it’s building consistent, sustainable habits that compound over time.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Solar Pro 4 costs 39x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2
Input
$1.75
Output
$14.00
Solar Pro 4
Input
$0.09
19× cheaper
Output
$0.36
39× cheaper

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on both: 19× input, 39× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts

GPT-5.22 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·100% upOpenAI$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·99.6% up
Solar Pro 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.09 in·$0.36 out·524k·99.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.2 and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 is $1.66/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.2 and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.2 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoHy3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-5.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-5.2 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.2 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GPT-5.2 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Solar Pro 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Same size
Solar Pro 4 logoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Same size
Solar Pro 4 logoQwen3 Coder logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
Solar Pro 4 logoQwen3 Coder Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider

Model pages

GPT-5.2 logo
GPT-5.253 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 4 logo
Solar Pro 414 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed