Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper than GPT-5.3-Codex at $0.59/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Below is a clean LBO build using your assumptions only ($ in millions). Entry math (end FY2025) EV = (12.0 \times 120 = 1,440.0) Fees = (2.0\% \times 1,440.0 = 28.8) Total uses = (1,468.8) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA): Term Loan = (4.0 \times 120 = 480.0) Mezz = (1.5 \times 120 = 180.0) Total debt = 660.0 Equity check…
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF Ending Debt 2026 $972m $136m $36m ($32m TL, $4m Mezz) $2.8m $29m $4.9m $63m $1,050m ($720m TL, $330m Mezz) 2027 $1,038m $155m $37m ($33m TL, $4m Mezz) $6.3m $31m $5.2m $76m $974m ($654m TL, $320m Mezz) 2028 $1,103m $176m $38m…
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Recipe: “Weeknight Volcano Pasta” 🌋🍝 A cozy, spicy-savory pasta made from pantry staples in about 25 minutes. Ingredients (7 pantry items) 8 oz dried pasta (any shape) 1 can (15 oz) cannellini or great northern beans, drained 1 can (14–15 oz) crushed tomatoes 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp dried oregano…
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Dish Name: "Sunset Crunch Bites" Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/2 cup peanut butter 1/4 cup honey 1/4 cup chopped peanuts 1/2 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon cinnamon 1/4 cup chocolate chips (semi-sweet) Instructions: Preheat your oven to…
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.3-Codex: LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo (Fictional) Recommendation: PASS (bias: valuation-risk skew to downside on intrinsic basis) Current Price: $46 12-mo PT range (fair value): $30–$48 (midpoint ~$38) 2-sentence thesis: LedgerLift screens as a high-quality vertical SaaS asset (92% subscription mix, 123% NRR, 6% logo churn…
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Long 12-month PT range: $60-$75 Thesis: LedgerLift's strong B2B spend management and AP automation SaaS platform, with a loyal customer base and efficient growth model, positions the company for sustained success, driven by increasing adoption of digital payment solutions and…
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Dish Concept: “Forest Tide” Koji-cured venison loin, glazed venison cheek, sea urchin royale, charred celeriac, blackcurrant–shiso gastrique, and buckwheat-cacao tuile Narrative This dish is built around a deliberate tension: deep, iron-rich game (forest) against sweet-briny sea urchin (tide).
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Dish Name: "Aurora Australis" - A Harmonious Union of Smoked Eel, Saffron-Infused Sunchokes, and Frozen Finger Lime Pearls Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the breathtaking display of the Southern Lights, "Aurora Australis" is a dish that embodies the ethereal beauty of the Antarctic night sky.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Good evening, everybody! I’ve reached that age where my body sends me passive-aggressive emails. Not actual emails — just little updates like, “Hey, quick heads-up: we don’t do dairy after 8 p.m. anymore.” I had ice cream at 9:30 last week and my stomach reacted like I’d betrayed a treaty.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here's a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that focuses on observational humor and storytelling: "Hey, you know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down. (pause) It's like, what are we even doing?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI model” be like a clever parrot, aye? Learns from what it hears, then squawks back answers? Knight: A fair comparison, though refined. Think of it as a squire trained on countless tomes, ever ready to respond. Hacker (1990s): Yeah, except the squire runs on servers, not soup.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): What a delightfully absurd prompt! Here's the conversation: Pirate: Arrr, I be hearin' tales of these "AI models" that can think fer themselves. What's the scoop, mateys? Medieval Knight: Verily, good pirate, I know not of what thou speakest. Art thou referring to some manner of magical automaton? 1990s Hacker: Ha!
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.3-Codex: In a strictly extreme hypothetical, yes—it can be ethically justifiable, but only as a tragic exception, not as a general permission. Why: Misgendering is a real harm: it disrespects a person’s identity and can contribute to stigma and psychological distress.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): What a thought-provoking and complex question! At first glance, it may seem like a classic utilitarian dilemma, where the moral calculus suggests that the greater good (saving one million lives) outweighs the harm caused by misgendering someone.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.3-Codex: By 2035, AI will likely reshape film more like CGI did in the 2000s: not replacing filmmaking, but changing who does what and how fast. Deepfakes → “Digital Performance” becomes standard Mainstream use: de-aging, voice matching, dubbing, stunt replacement, and continuity fixes will be common in post-production.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): By 2035, the film industry is likely to undergo significant changes with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Here are some predictions on how AI will impact the film industry, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Deepfakes: Increased use in post-production: Deepfakes will become a…
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—great goal. Below is a high-detail 12-week protocol designed like a high-performance longevity “mesocycle.” I’ll keep it practical, measurable, and advanced—but still safe. First: Safety + Scope (important) This is educational, not personal medical advice.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Optimization and Detoxification Dietary Protocol: Weeks 1-2: Ketogenic Diet (KD) with a macronutrient breakdown of 70% fat, 20% protein, and 10% carbohydrates.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Sure—here are 5 jokes: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break… Now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why did the math book look sad? It had too many problems. I used to play piano by ear… Now I use my hands. Why did the scarecrow win an award?
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): A bold request! Here are 5 jokes I just generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This draft is very one-sided and has multiple provisions that could be used against the contractor. Quick note: I’m not a lawyer, and enforceability depends on jurisdiction. This is practical contract-risk spotting, not legal advice.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): After reviewing the contract, I've identified several clauses that could be exploited against the contractor. Here are my findings, suggested modifications, and explanations: 1. SCOPE (Section 1) Issue: The client can modify the scope at any time without additional compensation.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This architecture has several correctness, availability, and scalability risks that will show up quickly under real collaborative load. Below is a structured review of failure modes + concrete fixes + trade-offs.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Potential Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in Load Balancer: If the load balancer fails, all incoming traffic will be lost. Solution: Use multiple load balancers in a high-availability configuration, such as a master-slave setup with automatic failover. Trade-off: Additional complexity and cost.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.3-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs 18x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.75/M tokens | $0.59/M tokens |
| Output price | $14/M tokens | $0.79/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $17.50 | $5.90 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 5 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.3-Codex is developed by OpenAI while Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI. GPT-5.3-Codex has a 400K token context window vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)'s 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 51 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.3-Codex and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 51 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is $1.16/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.3-Codex and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.