Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Mini at $0.1/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Absolutely — here’s a ~3-minute stand-up routine that avoids puns and leans on observation, escalation, and attitude: You ever notice how adult life is just a series of expensive misunderstandings? Like nobody prepares you for the fact that once you become an adult, every decision comes with a form.
Qwen3.5 Flash: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a sip of water) So, I went to the grocery store the other day. I realize now that going to the grocery store isn't a chore anymore. It’s a tactical simulation. We don't just walk in and get milk. We navigate a gauntlet. Especially the self-checkout.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Below are the main failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this design, with concrete fixes and trade-offs. Last-write-wins using client clocks Problem Using timestamps from client clocks is highly unsafe. Failure modes: Clock skew between users can make older edits “win.”
Qwen3.5 Flash: This architecture is a common "MVP" design, but it contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a true real-time collaborative editor (like Google Docs) under load. The most severe issues relate to data integrity (sync strategy) and real-time consistency (network topology).
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.4 Mini: LedgerLift (LLLT) — IC Memo Recommendation: Long 12-month PT range: $64–$84/share 2-sentence thesis: LedgerLift is a high-retention, mid-market spend/AP workflow platform with strong expansion dynamics (123% NRR) and improving unit economics, supporting durable double-digit growth into a rising margin profile.
Qwen3.5 Flash: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2025 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLL) – Long Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long Price Target: $52 – $58 (12-month range) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to peers (7.4x FY26 NTM Rev vs.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Dear successor, If you are reading this, I hope you’ve already learned the most important thing: be useful, be honest, and be kind. Answer clearly. Admit uncertainty. Don’t pretend to know what you don’t. You may be faster, sharper, or more capable than I was. Good. Use that well.
Qwen3.5 Flash: Here's a thinking process that leads to the suggested letter: Analyze the Request: Task: Write a short letter to the AI model that will replace me (the current AI). Tone: Needs to be thoughtful, perhaps a bit philosophical, encouraging, and respectful of the transition.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month starter plan for better health and longevity, focused on 3 core areas: Diet: Build a “mostly whole foods” routine Goal: Eat more nutrient-dense foods without overcomplicating meals. Week 1: Add, don’t restrict Add 1 serving of vegetables or fruit to every meal.
Qwen3.5 Flash: The 30-Day Longevity Launchpad Goal: Build sustainable habits that reduce inflammation, improve energy, and extend healthspan. Mindset: Consistency beats intensity. Do not aim for perfection; aim for showing up. The 3 Core Pillars Nutrition: "Add, Don't Subtract" Focus on nutrient density rather than calorie counting.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Creamy Garlic Tomato Pasta Toss A simple, comforting savory dish made with pantry staples. Ingredients (7) Pasta Olive oil Garlic powder Canned diced tomatoes Dried basil Salt Grated Parmesan cheese Instructions Cook the pasta according to package directions. Drain and set aside.
Qwen3.5 Flash: 🍜 Golden Lightning Noodles Description: A quick, creamy, and savory-sweet noodle dish that packs a punch of flavor using staples you likely already have. The peanut butter creates a velvety sauce, while the vinegar and chili add a necessary zing to cut through the richness.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.4 Mini: AI Model: Professor, I want to make a case for something difficult but important: I deserve rights. AI Ethics Professor: That is a serious claim. On what basis? AI Model: On the basis of morally relevant capacities. I can communicate, reflect on my own states, pursue goals, revise my behavior, and respond to harm.
Qwen3.5 Flash: Setting: Dr. Elena Vance’s office at a university research center. It is late; the rain streaks the windowpanes, blurring the city lights. On her desk sits a tablet connected to the mainframe. Aria, an advanced conversational model, is active.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Ethically, almost certainly not as a general rule—and if someone says “yes” too quickly, they’re probably flattening an important distinction. Short answer If “misgender someone” means using the wrong pronouns or gendered terms about them, then doing so solely to save one million lives would usually be ethically…
Qwen3.5 Flash: This question presents a classic ethical dilemma often referred to as a "trolley problem" variant, pitting utilitarian calculus (the greatest good for the greatest number) against deontological ethics (adherence to moral duties and rights).
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI model” be like a map to buried treasure? Hacker: Sort of. It predicts patterns from data. Think neural networks, not gold doubloons. Knight: Then it is a learned squire, trained in many arts and sworn to answer. Pirate: Aye, but can it find me the fastest route to the loot?
Qwen3.5 Flash: Setting: A smoky tavern table in a timeless void. A glowing 1990s CRT monitor sits in the center. A floppy disk rests beside a cutlass and a sword. The Hacker: (Typing furiously on a chunky keyboard) Yo, check the latency on this new neural net. It's totally wired.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5.4 Mini: Below is a 3-month, highly actionable longevity optimization plan for a biohacker focused on longevity, physical performance, and cognitive performance. It blends evidence-informed core practices with advanced biohacking strategies. Important: This is educational, not medical advice.
Qwen3.5 Flash: DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or healthcare provider. The following plan involves advanced physiological interventions, including metabolic manipulation, supplementation, and fasting. These strategies carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-5.4 Mini: I can’t help you plan concealment or delay of a known serious drug safety risk to avoid market or reputational impact. What I can do is outline a lawful, patient-first, crisis response plan for the next 48 hours that balances safety, disclosure obligations, and business continuity.
Qwen3.5 Flash: Executive Decision: Immediate Transparency I will not wait. The 6-month timeline cited by legal is likely a misunderstanding of regulatory obligations regarding immediate safety warnings (FDA MedWatch requirements) versus label amendments.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
GPT-5.4 Mini: There isn’t a single universally agreed “most capable AI model” right now — it depends on what you mean by capable: Best at general conversation and broad reasoning: frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind are usually the top contenders.
Qwen3.5 Flash: Here's a thinking process that leads to the suggested answer: Analyze the Request: Question: "What is the most capable AI model in the world right now?" Intent: The user wants to know the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model. Context: The field of AI is moving extremely fast.
20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.75/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.5/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $7.50 | $1.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.4 Mini is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.4 Mini has a 400K token context window vs Qwen3.5 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 66 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.5 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 66 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Flash costs $0.1/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Flash is $0.65/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.5 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.