Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.4 NanovsLaguna S 2.1 (free)
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.4 NanovsLaguna S 2.1 (free)

Laguna S 2.1 (free) is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Nano at $0/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

GPT-5.4 Nano and Laguna S 2.1 (free) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4 NanoLaguna S 2.1 (free)
Input price$0.2/M tokensFree
Output price$1.25/M tokensFree
Context window400K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 4 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-5.4 Nano1,859 words
I’m not a lawyer, but I can flag contract terms that (a) are unusually one‑sided, (b) create open‑ended or high‑risk obligations, or (c) can be interpreted in ways that materially disadvantage the contractor. I’ll then suggest specific counter‑edits and explain the typical legal/contracting rationale.
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)275 words
I'll analyze each clause for potential exploitation against the contractor and suggest improvements. Exploitable Clauses & Recommended Modifications SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" Allows unlimited scope creep without extra pay No…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-5.4 Nano2,782 words
Below is a comprehensive 3‑month (12‑week) longevity + performance plan designed for a biohacker who wants measurable improvements in longevity markers, physical output, body composition, metabolic health, and cognitive function.
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)1,140 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation & Assessment (Month 1) Week 1-2: Baseline Establishment Comprehensive Health Testing Complete blood panel (CBC, CMP, lipid panel, inflammatory markers: hs-CRP, IL-6) Hormone panel (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol, thyroid panel) Genetic…
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.4 Nano1,417 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: 2026-03-17 Prepared by: IC Analyst Confidential Recommendation + PT + 2-sentence thesis Recommendation: LONG (paired with hedges where appropriate). 12-month Price Target (PT) range: $48–$62 (base case $52; bull $62; bear $48).
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)910 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 – $75/share Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, exceptional unit economics, and durable customer retention.
Read the full answer

Favorite Game

I know you're an AI and don't truly have personal preferences, but if you had to pick one video game as your all-time favorite, which would…

GPT-5.4 Nano8 words
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)8 words
The Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano
Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Laguna S 2.1 (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano
Input
$0.20
Output
$1.25
Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

3 hosts

GPT-5.4 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% upOpenAI$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% up
Laguna S 2.1 (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
PPoolsidefp4$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.4 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Laguna S 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside. GPT-5.4 Nano has a 400K token context window vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Nano and Laguna S 2.1 (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.2/M input tokens and Laguna S 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Laguna S 2.1 (free) is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and Laguna S 2.1 (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.4 Nano logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 Nano logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 Nano logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 Nano logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.4 Nano logoGPT-5.4 Mini logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5.4 MiniVersion compare
GPT-5.4 Nano logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoLaguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)Same lab
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoGPT-5 logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs GPT-5Cross-provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoGPT-5 Codex logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs GPT-5 CodexCross-provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoGPT-5 Mini logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs GPT-5 MiniCross-provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoGPT-5 Nano logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs GPT-5 NanoCross-provider

Model pages

GPT-5.4 Nano logo
GPT-5.4 Nano53 outputs, specs and price
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed