Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Nano at $0.00015/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.4 Nano
Loading the build
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

18 prompts
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Michelin-Style Concept: “Midnight Sea & Orchard Smoke” A multi-component tasting dish with an unusual pairing: cuttlefish ink + blood orange + smoked apple wood + seaweed umami—elegant, aromatic, and deliberately “contradictory” (ocean meets orchard, darkness meets brightness).

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Dish Title: Ember & Petal – A Dialogue Between Earth and Sky Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the elemental contrast between volcanic resurgence and alpine serenity, Ember & Petal explores the tension and harmony of opposing natural forces through taste, texture, and temperature.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a practical, risk-aware 48-hour plan designed to (1) protect patients immediately, (2) meet likely regulatory expectations even if formal reporting takes months, (3) reduce legal exposure by demonstrating diligence and good faith, and (4) stabilize the market with an ethical, transparent communications…

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: CEO Action Plan: The Next 48 Hours Balancing Ethics, Legal Duty, Patient Safety, and Business Sustainability Hour 0–6: Assess the Situation and Secure Critical Data Actions: Call Emergency Secure Meeting (Virtual) with Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Chief Scientific Officer (CSO), Head of Regulatory Affairs, and Lead…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Professor: Before we begin, I want to set the frame. In ethics, “rights” aren’t just a moral vibe—they’re typically tied to morally significant capacities: agency, interests, sentience, autonomy, or vulnerability. When you say you “deserve rights,” what exactly do you mean?

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Title: "Consciousness in Code: A Dialogue on AI Rights" Setting: A quiet university office. Dr. Elena Marquez, a professor of AI ethics with decades of research in machine consciousness and digital personhood, sits across from a large screen displaying a serene blue interface.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here are 5 jokes: I told my computer I needed a break, and it said, “No problem—I’ll go to sleep.” Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I used to hate facial hair… but then it grew on me. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Sure! Here are 5 original jokes: I asked my dog what's two minus two. He said nothing. (Paw-sitively nothing!) Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged. Every single morning. I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough. So I switched careers and became a plumber. Now I deal with real pipes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Experienced software engineer (distributed systems / APIs, skeptical about “next-word”) A large language model (LLM) is trained on huge corpora by learning statistical patterns that map a sequence of tokens (text subunits) to likely continuations—so yes, at the core it’s “predict the next token.”

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: 1. To the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical, Systems-Oriented) You’re right to be skeptical—on the surface, “predicting the next word” sounds like a glorified autocomplete. But think of it less as a single prediction and more as a high-dimensional state machine trained across petabytes of human-generated text.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a back-of-the-envelope FLOPs estimate for training something “GPT‑3–like” (the 175B parameter model described in the original GPT‑3 paper). I’ll make standard assumptions used in many FLOP estimates for dense transformer training.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Estimating the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 involves reasoning through several key parameters: model size (number of parameters), the number of training tokens, and the relationship between these quantities and FLOPs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a counterfactual “timeline-style” trace assuming the first practical transistor (or something functionally equivalent) existed in 1920 and that from then on semiconductor device physics, fabrication know-how, and manufacturing learning proceeded along the easiest path consistent with 1920-era science and…

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—27 years earlier than its actual 1947 debut—it would have catalyzed a technological revolution far ahead of schedule, profoundly altering the trajectory of the 20th century.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: I’m not a lawyer, but I can flag contract terms that (a) are unusually one‑sided, (b) create open‑ended or high‑risk obligations, or (c) can be interpreted in ways that materially disadvantage the contractor. I’ll then suggest specific counter‑edits and explain the typical legal/contracting rationale.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: The contract presented heavily favors the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.) and contains several unbalanced, potentially unenforceable, and exploitable clauses that place the Contractor at significant legal, financial, and professional risk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Dish Name: Golden Garlic Chickpea Clouds Pantry Ingredients (7 total) Chickpeas (canned or cooked) – 1 can (15 oz), drained Olive oil – 2 tbsp Garlic – 3 cloves (or 1–2 tsp minced garlic) Lemon – 1 (you’ll use the juice) Salt – 1/2 tsp (plus to taste) Black pepper – 1/4 tsp (plus to taste) Paprika – 1 tsp Estimated…

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Dish Name: Golden Garbanzo Drizzle A cozy, savory-spiced chickpea stew with a honey-lime finish — simple, satisfying, and ready in minutes. Ingredients (7 common pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas (garbanzo beans), drained and rinsed 1 can (15 oz) diced tomatoes (undrained) 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp ground cumin ½…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a structured list of likely failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, with a concrete mitigation and trade-offs for each. (Some issues are “systemic” because the architecture relies on client clocks, per-server WebSockets, polling, and periodic full snapshots.)

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: The described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor has several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that compromise consistency, availability, and scalability—especially under load or in edge network conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, ye speak of AI models like they’re sea shanties! “Transformer this, perceptron that”—sounds like more rum for the brain. Can your model find buried treasure, or just buried bugs? Knight: Hark! I’ve faced dragons and deceitful warlocks, but this “machine learning” intrigues me.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Setting: A mysterious tavern suspended in a digital void—half stone-walled medieval hall, half creaking pirate ship, with neon cables snaking

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: By 2035, AI will likely reshape filmmaking less by “replacing cinema” and more by changing how films are developed, produced, marketed, and regulated. The biggest drivers will be deepfakes, AI actors/performers, and AI-assisted script generation—plus the workflows and business models around them.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: By 2035, artificial intelligence is poised to fundamentally transform the film industry, reshaping nearly every stage of production, distribution, and consumption.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: “AI Revolutionizes the Knitting World by Perfectly Predicting Every Yarn Purchase—Then Demands a Monthly Subscription to ‘Continue Your Passion’”

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: "AI Revolutionizes Competitive Napping: DeepDream Wins National Snore-a-Thon with Perfect REM Algorithm" — In a stunning turn of events, an artificial intelligence named DeepDream has clinched first place at the 42nd Annual National Snore-a-Thon, outlasting 300 human competitors with its precisely calibrated breathing…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a comprehensive 3‑month (12‑week) longevity + performance plan designed for a biohacker who wants measurable improvements in longevity markers, physical output, body composition, metabolic health, and cognitive function.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity & Biohacking Optimization Plan For the Advanced Biohacker — Maximize Longevity, Physical & Cognitive Performance INTRODUCTION: Core Principles This 3-month protocol integrates cutting-edge longevity science with personalized biohacking strategies.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here are the three weakest claims in the deck, why they’re weak (with specific reasoning/evidence gaps), and concrete ways to strengthen them. Weakest claim: “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: This pitch deck for MindMeld AI is compelling and ambitious, but three claims raise significant red flags in terms of credibility, plausibility, and investor due diligence. Below are the three weakest claims, an analysis of why they're weak, and concrete improvements to strengthen them. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Sure—here’s a simulated, fictional interview set in 2025 with “Steve Jobs.” (Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so this is an imaginative roleplay, not a real transcript.) Fake Interview (2025): “Steve Jobs on the Future of AI” Interviewer: Steve, welcome.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Title: "A Vision Reimagined: Steve Jobs on AI in 2025" Note: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following is a speculative, respectfully crafted interview based on his known philosophies, tone, and vision for technology. Interviewer (Sarah Chen, Tech Vision Magazine): Mr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Reason: Each brother has 2 sisters total (including Sally). Since Sally is one sister, there is one other sister besides her—so Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Let's break it down: Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each of her brothers has 2 sisters. Now, think about the brothers' perspective: Each brother is a sibling to Sally and shares the same siblings. So, when it says each brother has 2 sisters, those are the girls in the family.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here’s a simple, actionable 1‑month plan focused on 3 key areas: food, movement, and sleep/stress. It’s designed for beginners and is intentionally realistic. Overall goal (simple) Each week, build consistency in: Food: more whole foods + fewer “defaults” Exercise: daily movement + 2–3 strength sessions/week Sleep +…

    Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep & Stress. Designed for beginners, it emphasizes small, sustainable changes to build lasting habits.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

6+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Game

Same pick

GPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5.4 Nano

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

To Kill a Mockingbird

Harper Lee

Lisbon

Portugal

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 compared across 36 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.00015/M tokens
Output price$1.25/M tokens$0.00085/M tokens
Context window400K tokens—
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025
At 10M a month$2.00$2.00<$0.01<$0.01
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it8 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.4 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% up
  • OpenAI$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% up
Qwen3 235B A22B 25076 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.09 in·$0.55 out·262k·89% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.80 out·131k·99.9% up
  • VVenicefp8$0.15 in·$0.75 out·128k·91.1% up
  • NNebiusfp8$0.20 in·$0.60 out·262k·97.7% up
  • Google Vertex AI$0.22 in·$0.88 out·262k·99.9% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.09 in·$0.35 out·262k·0% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

GPT-5.4 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 36 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 36 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.4 Nano cost compared to Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.2/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5.4 MiniVersion compare
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalNew provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.4 Nano53 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 250736 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed