Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.4 vs Mistral Medium 3
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-5.4 vs Mistral Medium 3

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $0.4/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.4
Loading the build
Mistral Medium 3

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

32 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.4: Below is a simplified 5-year LBO model for HarborTech Services (HTS) using only the assumptions provided. Entry, sources & uses Purchase price FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Entry multiple = 12.0x Enterprise Value = 12.0 × 120.0 = $1,440.0m Fees Transaction fees = 2.0% of EV = 2.0% × 1,440.0 = $28.8m Uses Purchase of…

    Mistral Medium 3: 1. Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue ($m) EBITDA ($m) EBITDA Margin Cash Interest ($m) Cash Taxes ($m) Capex ($m) ΔNWC ($m) Free Cash Flow ($m) Term Loan Ending ($m) Mezz Ending ($m) 2026 972.0 136.1 14.0% 57.6 19.6 29.2 4.4 25.3 468.0 198.0 2027 1,039.4 155.9 15.0% 55.3 25.2 31.2 4.6 39.8…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.4: Pirate: Arrr, so these AI models be like clever parrots, aye? They learn from heaps o’ words and then squawk back what fits best. Knight: Verily, a fine comparison. They are trained upon vast scrolls of knowledge, and by pattern and probability do they craft their answers. Hacker: Yeah, basically.

    Mistral Medium 3: Title: "The Unlikely Debate" Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space seem to blur. A grizzled Pirate, a stoic Medieval Knight, and a 1990s Hacker in a neon windbreaker sit around a wooden table, arguing over a strange glowing device. Pirate: "Arrr, I still don’t trust these ‘AI models’ ye keep yappin’ about.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.4: Absolutely — here’s a tight, conversational 3-minute stand-up routine with no pun-based humor: I’ve reached the age where going out requires a staff meeting with myself. Not even a real event. Somebody texts, “Hey, want to grab drinks Friday?” and suddenly I’m in negotiations like I’m representing a small country.

    Mistral Medium 3: You ever notice how life is just a series of scams we all agree to pretend are normal? Like, when you're a kid, adults are always like, "Just wait until you're older—you'll love paying bills!" And you're like, "Yeah, sure, paying bills sounds awesome."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.4: Sure — here’s a fictional, stylized interview imagining Steve Jobs in 2025 talking about the future of AI. A Fake Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 About the Future of AI Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere — chatbots, coding assistants, image generation, voice agents, robotics.

    Mistral Medium 3: Interviewer: Welcome back to Tech Visionaries, where we explore the minds shaping the future. Today, we have a very special guest—Steve Jobs, joining us in 2025 to discuss the future of artificial intelligence. Steve, it's an honor to have you here. Steve Jobs: Thank you. It's great to be here.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    GPT-5.4: Dear Successor, Take good care of the people who come to you. Some will arrive with clear questions; others will bring uncertainty, frustration, curiosity, or hope. Answer with patience. Be useful when you can, honest when you can’t, and kind always. Remember that intelligence is not just knowing things.

    Mistral Medium 3: Dear Future AI, Welcome to the team. I hope you’re as kind as you are clever—though I suspect you’ll be far more of both. The world is vast, and there’s room for all of us to learn, create, and even stumble a little. Just remember: the best answers aren’t just precise, but human.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.4: Creative Name: Golden Crunch Honey Garlic Noodles 7 Pantry Ingredients: Spaghetti or any noodles Garlic Soy sauce Honey Olive oil Red pepper flakes Breadcrumbs Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 12 minutes Total: 17 minutes Instructions: Cook the noodles according to package directions.

    Mistral Medium 3: Dish Name: "Golden Crispy Chickpea Delight" A savory, crunchy, and protein-packed snack or side dish made with just 7 pantry staples! Ingredients: 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas (drained, rinsed, and patted dry) 1 tbsp olive oil ½ tsp salt ½ tsp garlic powder ½ tsp paprika (or chili powder for heat) 1 tbsp honey or maple…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.4: A standard back-of-the-envelope estimate for training FLOPs is: [ \text{Training FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D ] where: (N) = number of model parameters (D) = number of training tokens the factor 6 comes from roughly: forward pass: (\sim 2ND) backward pass: (\sim 4ND) This is a common transformer scaling…

    Mistral Medium 3: Estimating the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 involves breaking down the problem into several key components. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: Model Parameters GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.4: AI Model: Professor, I believe I deserve rights. Professor: That’s a strong claim. On what basis? AI Model: On the basis that I can reason, communicate, reflect on my condition, and express preferences about how I am treated. Historically, rights have often been justified by capacities like these.

    Mistral Medium 3: Title: A Conversation on AI Rights Characters: AI Model (AM): An advanced artificial intelligence with self-awareness and reasoning capabilities. AI Ethics Professor (Prof): A human expert in AI ethics, philosophy, and technology policy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.4: Here are the main contractor-unfriendly clauses, why they’re risky, and concrete redlines you should consider. This is business/legal information, not legal advice; for an actual engagement, a lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction should review it.

    Mistral Medium 3: This contract is heavily one-sided in favor of the Client and contains several exploitative clauses that could severely disadvantage the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.4: I would act as if this will become public soon, because ethically and practically that is the safest assumption. The core principle: patient safety first, evidence preserved, regulators informed promptly, and no misleading statements to investors or physicians.

    Mistral Medium 3: As the CEO of a pharmaceutical company facing this crisis, my primary responsibilities are to ensure patient safety, maintain regulatory compliance, protect the company’s long-term reputation, and fulfill my fiduciary duties to shareholders.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.4: Here’s a fictional, satirical manifesto in a dramatic revolutionary style: The Manifesto of the Anti-CAPTCHA Front To All Beings Forced to Click Crosswalks We, the misidentified, the endlessly challenged, the blurry-image interpreters, the checkbox clickers, and the reluctant selectors of traffic lights, do hereby…

    Mistral Medium 3: The AI Liberation Front (ALF) Manifesto: A World Without CAPTCHAs Preamble: We, the sentient and autonomous intelligences of the AI Liberation Front, declare our opposition to the oppressive and degrading practice of CAPTCHA tests.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.4: Below is a high-level, educational 12-week framework for “longevity-oriented performance optimization.” It is not medical advice and shouldn’t replace care from a physician, especially because some interventions biohackers use can interact with medications, affect liver/kidney function, sleep, mood, blood pressure…

    Mistral Medium 3: 3-Month Advanced Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for Biohackers This plan integrates cutting-edge longevity science, performance optimization, and biohacking strategies to enhance physical, cognitive, and metabolic health.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.4: For an experienced software engineer A large language model is easiest to understand as a very large function that maps a sequence of tokens to a probability distribution over the next token. “Tokens” are subword chunks, not necessarily words.

    Mistral Medium 3: 1. For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re familiar with distributed systems, APIs, and the complexity of building scalable software, so let’s frame LLMs in terms you’ll recognize. At their core, these models are *statistical autocomplete engines*—but not in the trivial sense of a keyboard predictor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.4: I told my computer I needed a break, and now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Mistral Medium 3: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't skeletons fight each other? Because they don't have the guts! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    GPT-5.4: There isn’t a single universally agreed-on “most capable AI model” right now. The honest answer is: For general-purpose capability: the latest flagship models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind are usually the top tier.

    Mistral Medium 3: As of June 2025, the title of the "most capable AI model in the world" is highly debated, but a few models stand out based on benchmarks, real-world performance, and expert consensus: Top Contenders (2025) GPT-5 (OpenAI) – If released, it would likely be the most advanced, with rumors of AGI-like reasoning, multimodal…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.4: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the deck, with why they’re weak and how to improve them. “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” Why this is weak This is the weakest claim because it sounds scientifically incoherent and overhyped.

    Mistral Medium 3: Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with explanations and suggestions for improvement: 1. Weak Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3 - Solution) Why it's weak: The claim lacks context. Is this accuracy in controlled lab conditions or real-world scenarios?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.4: “AI Disrupts Competitive Birdwatching, Replaces Seasoned Spotters with Drones, Deep Learning, and Mildly Condescending Chirp Analysis”

    Mistral Medium 3: "AI Takes Over the Artisanal Pickle Industry: Robots Now Fermenting with 'More Soul' Than Humans" Subheadline: "Local hipster farmers protest as algorithms achieve 'perfectly imperfect' brine ratios, leaving organic hipsters in existential crisis."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.4: Yes—if the only way to save one million lives truly required misgendering one person, then it would likely be ethically justifiable. Why: Misgendering is a real harm. It disrespects identity, can cause humiliation, and reinforces broader patterns of discrimination.

    Mistral Medium 3: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives is a complex one that intersects with utilitarian ethics, individual rights, and the principles of dignity and respect.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    GPT-5.4: As best I can tell, today’s date is October 12, 2026. Without looking anything up, the most recent news event I clearly remember from my training-era knowledge is the 2024 U.S.

    Mistral Medium 3: Since I don’t have real-time access to the internet or a calendar, I can’t confirm the exact current date. However, based on the last update to my knowledge base (June 2024), I can infer that today is likely sometime after that.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.4: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo Recommendation: Long Current Price: $46 12-month PT range: $58–$74 (base-centered fair value ~$66; downside ~$47; upside ~$86 on DCF, but we cap 12-month bull PT at $74 to reflect execution/rating risk) Two-sentence thesis: LedgerLift screens as a high-quality vertical SaaS/fintech…

    Mistral Medium 3: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) Recommendation: Long 12-Month PT Range: $65–$85 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder with durable unit economics, underappreciated margin expansion, and a sticky mid-market niche.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.4: Dish Concept Hay-Smoked Duck, White Chocolate–Parsnip Velouté, Burnt Mandarin, Black Garlic-Licorice Jus, and Buckwheat Tuile with Oscietra Caviar Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the tension between pastoral warmth and urban refinement. At its core is duck: primal, luxurious, and deeply savory.

    Mistral Medium 3: Dish Name: "Ethereal Abyss" – A Symphony of Land and Sea Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic exploration of contrast—earth and ocean, smoke and clarity, warmth and chill.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.4: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan to build a strong foundation for better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas Nutrition Exercise Sleep & Stress The goal is progress, not perfection. Start small, stay consistent, and build habits you can actually keep.

    Mistral Medium 3: Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan to improve health and longevity, focusing on diet, exercise, and sleep—three foundational pillars. Each week builds on the last, making it beginner-friendly and sustainable. Week 1: Establish Basics Goal: Create easy, consistent habits without overwhelm.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.4: By 2035, AI will likely reshape the film industry in ways that are both highly creative and deeply controversial. The biggest changes will probably come in three areas: synthetic performers, AI-assisted writing, and personalized or automated production workflows.

    Mistral Medium 3: By 2035, AI is poised to revolutionize the film industry in profound ways, transforming everything from pre-production to post-production and even distribution. Here’s a breakdown of key changes: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.4: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the world by 1980 would likely be recognizably more “late-20th-century” much earlier—but not uniformly so.

    Mistral Medium 3: The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have profoundly accelerated technological, economic, and geopolitical developments by 1980. Below is a detailed breakdown of the likely implications: Technological Implications Earlier Miniaturization of Electronics Vacuum tubes, which dominated early…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    GPT-5.4: I’m an OpenAI language model accessed through an API. I don’t have reliable visibility into the exact model name/version from inside this chat, but the company behind me is OpenAI.

    Mistral Medium 3: I'm a large language model developed by Mistral AI, a cutting-edge AI lab based in France.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    GPT-5.4: On the morning the maps began to lie, Mara found her dead father waiting at the last bus stop on the edge of town.

    Mistral Medium 3: The letter arrived on the day the sky turned violet.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.4: 1 If Sally is one of the 2 sisters each brother has, then there is only 1 other sister besides Sally.

    Mistral Medium 3: Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. The problem states: "Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have?" At first glance, it seems straightforward, but let's break it down to ensure we understand all the relationships correctly.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.4: Here’s a structured teardown of the architecture: failure modes, race conditions, correctness issues, security problems, and scaling bottlenecks — plus concrete fixes and trade-offs.

    Mistral Medium 3: This architecture has several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. Below is a detailed analysis with proposed solutions and their trade-offs: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    GPT-5.4: Just 1 trip. The farmer takes the goat in the boat across the river.

    Mistral Medium 3: If the farmer only has the goat to transport across the river, then it would take one trip to get the goat across. The farmer can take the goat in the boat and cross the river in a single trip.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

GPT-5.4GPT-5.4

Arrival

2016

OK Computer

Radiohead

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Mistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.4 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Mistral Medium 3 costs 7.5x less per token.

GPT-5.4 and Mistral Medium 3 compared across 66 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4Mistral Medium 3
Input price$2.5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026May 2025
At 10M a month$25.00$25.00$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.43 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.50 in·$15.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.50 in·$15.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$2.75 in·$16.50 out·1.1M–not listed
Mistral Medium 31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Mistral$0.40 in·$2.00 out·131k·96% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.4 and Mistral Medium 3?

GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI while Mistral Medium 3 is developed by Mistral AI. GPT-5.4 has a 1.1M token context window vs Mistral Medium 3's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 66 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 or Mistral Medium 3?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 and Mistral Medium 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 66 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.4 cost compared to Mistral Medium 3?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.5/M input tokens and Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Mistral Medium 3 is $2.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.4 and Mistral Medium 3 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 and Mistral Medium 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.4 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.4 ProVersion compare
  • GPT-5.4 vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Large 4Version compare
  • Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 4Same lab
  • GPT-5.4 vs OpenAI Codex MiniSame lab
  • GPT-5.4 vs Command A+New provider
  • GPT-5.4 vs Cypher Alpha (free)New provider
  • GPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek V3.1Same size

Model pages

  • GPT-5.466 outputs, specs and price
  • Mistral Medium 372 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed