Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.4vsQwen3.7 Flash
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.4vsQwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $0.03/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.

GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Flash compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 Flash
Input price$2.5/M tokens$0.03/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$0.13/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.4169 words
Creative Name: Golden Crunch Honey Garlic Noodles 7 Pantry Ingredients: Spaghetti or any noodles Garlic Soy sauce Honey Olive oil Red pepper flakes Breadcrumbs Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 12 minutes Total: 17 minutes Instructions: Cook the noodles according to package directions.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash332 words
🥔 Golden Crunch Smash-Roasted Potatoes A crowd-pleasing side dish that delivers maximum crispiness with minimal effort. By boiling then smashing the potatoes before roasting, you create a shatteringly crisp crust while keeping the inside fluffy. This recipe relies on just seven pantry staples for perfect flavor.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GPT-5.42,705 words
I would act as if this will become public soon, because ethically and practically that is the safest assumption. The core principle: patient safety first, evidence preserved, regulators informed promptly, and no misleading statements to investors or physicians.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,240 words
This is a high-stakes crisis requiring decisive, legally compliant, ethically grounded, and strategically coordinated action. Below is a structured, hour-by-hour executive playbook for the next 48 hours, followed by cross-cutting rationale addressing your specified dimensions.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-5.42,522 words
Here are the main contractor-unfriendly clauses, why they’re risky, and concrete redlines you should consider. This is business/legal information, not legal advice; for an actual engagement, a lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction should review it.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,322 words
This agreement contains several highly one-sided provisions that create significant legal, financial, and operational risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, recommended modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. Note: Contract law varies by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GPT-5.41,322 words
For an experienced software engineer A large language model is easiest to understand as a very large function that maps a sequence of tokens to a probability distribution over the next token. “Tokens” are subword chunks, not necessarily words.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,038 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM’s training process less as “teaching” and more as optimizing a high-dimensional function across a petabyte-scale dataset, much like you’d architect a distributed system to handle massive throughput.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-5.4811 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan to build a strong foundation for better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas Nutrition Exercise Sleep & Stress The goal is progress, not perfection. Start small, stay consistent, and build habits you can actually keep.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash763 words
🌱 30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan This plan focuses on the three most evidence-backed pillars of longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep/Recovery. It’s designed for beginners: low barrier to entry, zero equipment required, and built on consistency over intensity. You’ll progress gradually so habits stick.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-5.41,049 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the deck, with why they’re weak and how to improve them. “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” Why this is weak This is the weakest claim because it sounds scientifically incoherent and overhyped.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash776 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with why they raise red flags for sophisticated investors and how to concretely improve them. Weak Claim 1: Solution Slide "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.4 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 115x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.4
Input
$2.50
Output
$15.00
Qwen3.7 Flash
Input
$0.03
83× cheaper
Output
$0.13
115× cheaper

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on both: 83× input, 115× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.43 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.50 in·$15.00 out·1.1M·100% upOpenAI$2.50 in·$15.00 out·1.1M·100% upAmazon Bedrock$2.75 in·$16.50 out·1.1M—
Qwen3.7 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.03 in·$0.13 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.7 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.4 has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.7 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.4 costs $2.5/M input tokens and Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03/M input tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash is $2.47/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.4 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-5.4 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.4 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-5.4 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.4 logoGPT-5.4 Pro logo
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.4 ProVersion compare
GPT-5.4 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoMistral Small 4 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Mistral Small 4New provider
Qwen3.7 Flash logoMistral Small Creative logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Mistral Small CreativeNew provider
GPT-5.4 logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark 1.1New provider
GPT-5.4 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark 1.3New provider

Model pages

GPT-5.4 logo
GPT-5.453 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed