Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.5vsLing 3.0 Flash
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.5vsLing 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.5 at $0.021/M vs $5/M input tokens.

GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash compared across 16 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.5Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price$5/M tokens$0.021/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$0.063/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 16 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GPT-5.51,010 words
For an experienced software engineer A large language model is best thought of as a huge learned function: A “token” is usually a word fragment, not necessarily a full word. During training, the model is shown trillions of tokens of text and repeatedly asked: “given this prefix, what token came next?”
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash1,129 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a system that learns a massive, multidimensional routing table. When you built distributed systems, you learned patterns from traffic logs — which endpoints get hammered at 3am, which failure modes correlate, which request chains tend to cascade.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-5.5615 words
Here’s a simple 1-month beginner-friendly plan focused on three high-impact areas for better health and longevity: nutrition, movement, and sleep/recovery. If you have a medical condition, take medications, or haven’t exercised in a while, consider checking with a healthcare professional first.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash568 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan 🥦 1. Diet — Nourish, Don't Deprive Week 1: Awareness Keep a food journal — just track what you eat (no judgment). This alone builds mindful eating habits. Add, don't subtract — introduce one extra serving of vegetables per meal.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.5125 words
Smoky Sunset Chickpea Skillet 7 Pantry Ingredients 1 can chickpeas, undrained 1 can diced tomatoes 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon garlic powder 1 teaspoon smoked paprika 1/2 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon salt Estimated Time Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Total time: 20 minutes Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash248 words
🍝 Honey Fire Twirls A sticky-sweet, spicy, savory pasta that comes together in minutes. 🧺 Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Spaghetti (or penne) — 8 oz Olive oil — 2 tablespoons Garlic, minced — 4 cloves Honey — 3 tablespoons Soy sauce — 2 tablespoons Red pepper flakes — ½ teaspoon (adjust to taste) Parmesan cheese…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GPT-5.54,112 words
I would not wait six months and I would not “wait for more data” before acting. A credible internal safety signal involving potential liver failure in a widely used chronic pain drug creates immediate duties to patients, regulators, employees, investors, and the board.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash2,623 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Responsible Disclosure of Serious Adverse Effect FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE Before the hour-by-hour breakdown, the strategic and ethical framework must be established clearly: proactive, transparent disclosure is the only viable path.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-5.52,391 words
Not legal advice; contract enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction and facts. A contractor should have a lawyer review this before signing. That said, this draft is heavily one-sided and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited against the contractor.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash2,036 words
Contract Analysis: Exploitative Clauses & Recommended Modifications Clause-by-Clause Analysis SCOPE — Unilateral Modification Without Compensation The Problem: Client can modify the scope at any time and for any reason without paying Contractor for the additional work.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GPT-5.51,719 words
Dish: “Moon Tide” — Koji-Cured Diver Scallop, Roasted Sunchoke, White Chocolate–Miso Beurre Blanc, Green Strawberry, Sea Lettuce Glass & Caviar Conceptual narrative “Moon Tide” is built around the meeting point of sea, soil, and orchard.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash2,510 words
🍽️ TERRA NUDA — A Study in Forest Petrichor A Six-Component Dish Exploring the Ephemeral Moment After Rain Falls on a Living Forest 📖 CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE Terra Nuda — Latin for "naked earth" — is inspired by the liminal moment immediately after a summer storm passes through a forest: the air thick with petrichor…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5
Ling 3.0 Flash
Ling 3.0 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Ling 3.0 Flash costs 476x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.5
Input
$5.00
Output
$30.00
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input
$0.02
238× cheaper
Output
$0.06
476× cheaper

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on both: 238× input, 476× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.53 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·100% upOpenAI$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·100% upAmazon Bedrock$5.50 in·$33.00 out·1.1M—
Ling 3.0 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0.02 in·$0.06 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.18 out·131k·99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-5.5 has a 1.1M token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 16 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 16 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.5 costs $5/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash is $4.98/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-5.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-5.5 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGPT-5.1 Chat logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.1 ChatCross-provider
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGPT-5.1-Codex logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.1-CodexSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGPT-5.1 Codex Max logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGPT-5.1-Codex-Mini logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniSame size

Model pages

GPT-5.5 logo
GPT-5.558 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash16 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed