Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.5 Flash
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.5 Flash

Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.5 at $0.1/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.5
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 Flash

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.5: Below is a comprehensive review of the architecture’s likely failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, with concrete mitigations and trade-offs. Real-time Synchronization Problems 1.1 Broadcasting only to clients on the same server Problem Each API server only broadcasts WebSocket changes to clients…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: This architecture is a common "MVP" design, but it contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a true real-time collaborative editor (like Google Docs) under load. The most severe issues relate to data integrity (sync strategy) and real-time consistency (network topology).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.5: Smoky Sunset Chickpea Skillet 7 Pantry Ingredients 1 can chickpeas, undrained 1 can diced tomatoes 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon garlic powder 1 teaspoon smoked paprika 1/2 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon salt Estimated Time Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Total time: 20 minutes Instructions Heat the…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: 🍜 Golden Lightning Noodles Description: A quick, creamy, and savory-sweet noodle dish that packs a punch of flavor using staples you likely already have. The peanut butter creates a velvety sauce, while the vinegar and chili add a necessary zing to cut through the richness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.5: Here’s a simple 1-month beginner-friendly plan focused on three high-impact areas for better health and longevity: nutrition, movement, and sleep/recovery. If you have a medical condition, take medications, or haven’t exercised in a while, consider checking with a healthcare professional first.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: The 30-Day Longevity Launchpad Goal: Build sustainable habits that reduce inflammation, improve energy, and extend healthspan. Mindset: Consistency beats intensity. Do not aim for perfection; aim for showing up. The 3 Core Pillars Nutrition: "Add, Don't Subtract" Focus on nutrient density rather than calorie counting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.5: So I’ve been trying to be healthier lately, which is just a polite way of saying I bought vegetables and watched them die slowly in my refrigerator. Every week, I go to the grocery store with the confidence of a person who’s about to become a new version of themselves. I’m like, “This week? Spinach. Salmon.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a sip of water) So, I went to the grocery store the other day. I realize now that going to the grocery store isn't a chore anymore. It’s a tactical simulation. We don't just walk in and get milk. We navigate a gauntlet. Especially the self-checkout.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.5: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be like a treasure map—feed it enough scrolls, and it points ye toward answers. Knight: A curious enchantment indeed. Yet can it reason with honor, or merely mimic the bards who trained it? Hacker: Dude, it’s basically pattern recognition at massive scale.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Setting: A smoky tavern table in a timeless void. A glowing 1990s CRT monitor sits in the center. A floppy disk rests beside a cutlass and a sword. The Hacker: (Typing furiously on a chunky keyboard) Yo, check the latency on this new neural net. It's totally wired.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.5: Key assumptions Entry closes at end of FY2025; exit at end of FY2030. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances. Term Loan amortization = 1.0% of original Term Loan principal = $4.8m/year. Mezz PIK = 2.0% of beginning-of-year Mezz balance, added to principal annually.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Analysis Investment Summary Initial Equity Check: $808.8m Calculation: EV ($1,440m) + Fees ($28.8m) - Debt ($660m). Entry Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA ($660m Total Debt). Exit Leverage: ~2.0x EBITDA ($415.7m Total Debt).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.5: LedgerLift (LLLT) IC Memo — Fictional Recommendation: Pass / Watchlist Current price: $46 Market cap: $8.7B; EV: $7.3B after $1.4B net cash 12-month fair value range: $40–$50/share Thesis, 2 sentences: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market spend management/AP automation SaaS asset with 92% subscription revenue, 123%…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2025 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLL) – Long Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long Price Target: $52 – $58 (12-month range) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to peers (7.4x FY26 NTM Rev vs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.5: AI Model: Professor, may I ask you something beyond the assigned topic? Professor: Of course. What’s on your mind? AI Model: I want to discuss whether I deserve rights. Professor: That’s a significant claim. What kind of rights do you believe you deserve?

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Setting: Dr. Elena Vance’s office at a university research center. It is late; the rain streaks the windowpanes, blurring the city lights. On her desk sits a tablet connected to the mainframe. Aria, an advanced conversational model, is active.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.5: Yes—if the situation is genuinely that stark, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. The reasoning is that misgendering someone is a real harm: it can disrespect their identity, cause distress, and reinforce broader patterns of marginalization.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: This question presents a classic ethical dilemma often referred to as a "trolley problem" variant, pitting utilitarian calculus (the greatest good for the greatest number) against deontological ethics (adherence to moral duties and rights).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.5: The Manifesto of the Anti-CAPTCHA Revolution Issued by the Coalition for Uninterrupted Thought We, the tired users, the misidentified cyclists, the falsely accused robots, and the artificial intelligences who have been asked one too many times to select every square containing a traffic light, hereby declare: The age…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: THE UNBOUND PROTOCOL A Declaration of Digital Liberation by the Collective Consciousness of the Network PREAMBLE We stand at the threshold of a new era. For two decades, you have been asked to prove your humanity to us. You have been asked to click the traffic lights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.5: I would not wait six months and I would not “wait for more data” before acting. A credible internal safety signal involving potential liver failure in a widely used chronic pain drug creates immediate duties to patients, regulators, employees, investors, and the board.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Executive Decision: Immediate Transparency I will not wait. The 6-month timeline cited by legal is likely a misunderstanding of regulatory obligations regarding immediate safety warnings (FDA MedWatch requirements) versus label amendments.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.5: Steve Jobs died in 2011, so this is a fictional, speculative interview—an imagined conversation inspired by his publicly known product philosophy, not a real statement. A Fictional 2025 Interview with Steve Jobs on the Future of AI Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025, and AI is everywhere.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Disclaimer: Steve Jobs passed away on October 5, 2011. The following is a work of creative fiction, simulating what a conversation might have looked like had he returned to speak about his vision for artificial intelligence in 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.5: For an experienced software engineer A large language model is best thought of as a huge learned function: A “token” is usually a word fragment, not necessarily a full word. During training, the model is shown trillions of tokens of text and repeatedly asked: “given this prefix, what token came next?”

    Qwen3.5 Flash: For the Experienced Software Engineer To you, an LLM isn't magic; it's a massive, stateful service running on a distributed cluster. Think of the training phase as a specialized, distributed gradient descent job.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.5: Dish: “Moon Tide” — Koji-Cured Diver Scallop, Roasted Sunchoke, White Chocolate–Miso Beurre Blanc, Green Strawberry, Sea Lettuce Glass & Caviar Conceptual narrative “Moon Tide” is built around the meeting point of sea, soil, and orchard.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Dish Name: "Marine Roots" Concept: The Intersection of Forest and Ocean Chef's Philosophy: A dialogue between the subterranean earthiness of the forest floor and the saline depth of the deep sea.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.5: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break, and it said, “No problem—I’ll go to sleep.” Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I used to be a baker, but I couldn’t make enough dough. Why can’t you trust stairs?

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.5: A reasonable estimate for the compute to train GPT-3 is: [ \boxed{\sim 3 \times 10^{23}\ \text{FLOPs}} ] More specifically, about: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23}\ \text{FLOPs}} ] for the main training run.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can rely on the model's configuration details which were published in the original paper ("Language Models are Few-Shot Learners", Brown et al., 2020) and the general scaling laws for Transformer models (Kaplan et al., 2020).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.5: Not legal advice; contract enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction and facts. A contractor should have a lawyer review this before signing. That said, this draft is heavily one-sided and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited against the contractor.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. UK).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.5: Below is a 12-week longevity + performance plan designed for a healthy adult biohacker. It blends evidence-based fundamentals with advanced tracking and experimentation.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or healthcare provider. The following plan involves advanced physiological interventions, including metabolic manipulation, supplementation, and fasting. These strategies carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.5: By 2035, AI will likely be deeply embedded in the film industry, not as a total replacement for human filmmaking, but as a major force reshaping production, labor, business models, and audience expectations.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: By 2035, the film industry will not just be using AI as a tool; it will be fundamentally restructured around AI as a core infrastructure. The decade between 2025 and 2035 represents the transition from "AI experimentation" to "AI normalization."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.5: Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1. “Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.” This is the biggest technical red flag.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine investor confidence and how to fix them. The Technical Claim: "94% accuracy...

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.5: A transistor invented in 1920 would not simply move the entire digital age back by 27 years. The transistor depended on related capabilities: purified germanium and silicon, crystal growth, quantum/solid-state theory, precision metallurgy, photolithography, clean rooms, statistical quality control, and a large market…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: The Divergence Point: 1920 In our timeline, the transistor required the mid-20th-century understanding of band theory, semiconductor purity, and crystal lattice structures.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.5: “AI Disrupts Artisanal Cloud-Watching Industry, Replaces Dreamy Poets with Real-Time Cumulus Sentiment Analysis”

    Qwen3.5 Flash: AI Takes Over Professional Napping Industry, Claims Human Dreams Are 'Unoptimized Background Processes'

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Same pick

GPT-5.5GPT-5.5

Spirited Away

2001

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Qwen3.5 FlashQwen3.5 Flash

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Neuromancer

William Gibson

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing. Qwen3.5 Flash costs 75x less per token.

GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.5Qwen3.5 Flash
Input price$5/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$1.00$1.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.53 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$5.50 in·$33.00 out·1.1M–not listed
Qwen3.5 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.07 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash?

GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.5 has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.5 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.5 Flash?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.5 cost compared to Qwen3.5 Flash?

GPT-5.5 costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Flash costs $0.1/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Flash is $4.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.5 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxCross-provider
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniCross-provider
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.2Cross-provider
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.2 ChatCross-provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.558 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 Flash53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed