Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.6 Luna ProvsHy3
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna ProvsHy3

Hy3 is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna Pro at $0.132/M vs $1/M input tokens.

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro and Hy3 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.6 Luna ProHy3
Input price$1/M tokens$0.132/M tokens
Output price$6/M tokens$0.528/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro126 words
Pantry Stardust Peanut Butter Oat Cookies Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10–12 minutes Makes: About 12 cookies Ingredients 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup all-purpose flour ½ cup peanut butter ½ cup granulated sugar 1 large egg ½ teaspoon baking soda ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions Preheat the oven to 350°F (175°C) and line a…
Read the full answer
Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro2,250 words
I would treat this as an urgent patient-safety and governance event, not as an earnings-management problem. A suspected fatal or life-threatening adverse effect affecting potentially hundreds of patients is sufficient to trigger immediate escalation, investigation, and regulator contact.
Read the full answer
Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro781 words
“94% accuracy,” with “any language, any device” Why it is weak This combines several extraordinary claims without defining the measurement: “Accuracy” could mean character accuracy, word accuracy, intent classification, or accuracy after autocorrect. Those produce very different results.
Read the full answer
Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro495 words
Sources, uses, and operating model Entry enterprise value: [ 12.0x \times \$120.0m=\$1,440.0m ] Transaction fees: [ 2.0\% \times \$1,440.0m=\$28.8m ] Debt at close: Term Loan: (4.0x \times \$120m=\$480.0m) Mezzanine: (1.5x \times \$120m=\$180.0m) Total debt: (\$660.0m) Sponsor equity…
Read the full answer
Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro3,077 words
A transistor invented in 1920 would not automatically produce a 1980-level computer in 1930. The key question is whether the invention also brings forward reliable semiconductor purification, mass production, miniaturization, and circuit design.
Read the full answer
Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro2,606 words
12-Week Longevity and Performance Plan This plan is designed for a generally healthy adult seeking better cardiometabolic health, physical capacity, cognitive performance, and recovery. It is not a substitute for medical care.
Read the full answer
Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Hy3
Hy3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Hy3 costs 11x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$6.00
Hy3
Input
$0.13
7.6× cheaper
Output
$0.53
11× cheaper

Hy3 is cheaper on both: 7.6× input, 11× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.20 in·$1.20 out·1.1M·92.3% upOpenAI$0.20 in·$1.20 out·1.1M·100% up
Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.7% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·100% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is developed by OpenAI while Hy3 is developed by Tencent. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro has a 1.1M token context window vs Hy3's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro and Hy3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro costs $1/M input tokens and Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens. Hy3 is $0.87/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.6 Luna Pro and Hy3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoGPT-5.6 Luna logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GPT-5.6 LunaVersion compare
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy3 logoSherlock Dash Alpha logo
Hy3 vs Sherlock Dash AlphaSame size
Hy3 logoSherlock Think Alpha logo
Hy3 vs Sherlock Think AlphaSame size
Hy3 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Hy3 vs Solar Pro 3New provider
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Solar Pro 4New provider

Model pages

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro58 outputs, specs and price
Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed