OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.1M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
9.1× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 9.1× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
31%
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro uses 2.2x more hedging
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.81Hedging0.37
2.9Bold5.7
5.1Lists4.0
0.54Emoji0.54
1.10Headings0.70
0.09Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
