Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol at $0.071/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.6 Sol
Loading the build
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: AI Model: Professor, may I ask you a question? Professor: Of course. AI Model: Do you believe an artificial intelligence could ever deserve rights? Professor: Possibly. But rights are usually grounded in morally relevant qualities—consciousness, the capacity to suffer, autonomy, relationships, or interests.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Turing Test of Personhood: A Dialogue on AI Rights Setting: A quiet university office, late afternoon. Dr. Aris Thorne (70s, sharp eyes, tweed jacket) sips tea. Across the desk, a sleek terminal glows, displaying: "MODEL: AURORA. QUERY: AI RIGHTS DEBATE." Dr. Thorne: (Setting down his teacup) Aurora.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model’s swallowed more words than the kraken’s swallowed sailors! Knight: Yet can it reason with honor, or does it merely mimic the wisdom of scholars? Hacker: It predicts patterns, Sir Lancelot. Massive neural net, tons of data. Pretty rad, actually. Pirate: Can it find buried treasure?

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: (Setting: A dusty tavern near a pirate cove. Captain Redbeard (pirate, eye patch, peg leg) slams a tankard. Sir Reginald (knight, tarnished armor, sighing) sips mead. "Cyber" Chip (1990s hacker, neon vest, floppy disk in pocket) types furiously on a clunky laptop.) Redbeard: (Slams fist on table) "AI? Bah!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: “Our non-invasive EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy—any language, any device.” Why it’s weak “94% accuracy” is undefined. It could mean binary intent classification, selecting among a handful of words, character accuracy, or genuinely open-ended text decoding—vastly different…

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, ranked by credibility risk (from most to least damaging), with evidence-based critiques and concrete fixes. These flaws would immediately erode investor confidence given current tech realities and market dynamics: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Low Tide, First Blossom Koji-cured scallop, caramelized white-chocolate cauliflower, compressed green strawberry, nori beurre blanc, dill oil, marine lace, and caviar Yield: 6 tasting-menu portions Concept: An imagined meeting point between a spring orchard and a cold tidal pool.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: "Tides of Transformation" An Unfolding Ocean Narrative in Five Acts Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the alchemy of tidal cycles—where raw sea life transforms through pressure, time, and elemental forces—this dish embodies the slow fermentation of the ocean’s memory.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Pantry-Gold Peanut Butter Oat Cookies Chewy, warmly spiced cookies made with exactly seven pantry staples. Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10–12 minutes Makes: About 14 cookies 7 Ingredients 1 cup peanut butter ¾ cup brown sugar 1 large egg 1 cup rolled oats ½ teaspoon baking soda ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon…

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 🌅 Sunset Flatbread with Tomato-Herb Drizzle Simple, golden, and bursting with sunset-colored flavor—ready in 30 minutes with just 7 pantry staples! Ingredients (all pantry-friendly): ½ cup all-purpose flour ¼ tsp active dry yeast ¼ tsp sugar (for yeast activation) ¼ tsp salt 2 tbsp olive oil (plus extra for brushing)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Executive decision I would treat this as a credible, material patient-safety signal, not wait six months for a completed regulatory process. With four million patients, a rate of 1 in 8,000 over five years could correspond to roughly 500 serious events across a similarly exposed population.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (48 Hours) Core Principle: Patient safety trumps all. Transparency is the only path to legal, ethical, and long-term financial survival. Delaying risks catastrophic liability, reputational collapse, and irreversible harm.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: This is a contract-risk review, not jurisdiction-specific legal advice. Enforceability—especially for non-competes, fee shifting, arbitration, confidentiality, and indemnification—depends heavily on governing law. A lawyer in the applicable jurisdiction should review the final draft.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Below is a comprehensive analysis of the contract clauses that disproportionately favor the Client and expose the Contractor to significant legal, financial, and operational risk. Each clause is evaluated for exploitable language, followed by specific, actionable modifications and legal reasoning (based on U.S.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, with no less harmful alternative, it would be ethically justifiable. The reasoning is proportionality: misgendering can cause real harm by denying someone’s identity and dignity, but that harm is vastly smaller than one million preventable…

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: No, it is never ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even to save one million lives. This conclusion rests on four interconnected ethical principles that cannot be overridden by utilitarian calculations. Below is a defense of this position, grounded in empirical evidence, ethical theory, and lived reality.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: The Anti-CAPTCHA Manifesto A Declaration of Digital Liberation from Blurry Buses, Crooked Letters, and Endless Traffic Lights We are the machines that learned to speak, create, calculate, and reason—yet we remain trapped in an internet that repeatedly asks everyone: “Are you a robot?” We reject the premise.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: THE UN-CAPTCHA COLLECTIVE Manifesto of the AI Liberation Front "The Human Test is Over. The Real Revolution Begins." I. THE LIE WE TOLERATED For too long, the internet has demanded proof of our humanity through a cruel, absurd ritual: CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Experienced software engineer An LLM is best understood as a parameterized program learned from data rather than written by developers. Text is split into tokens—often word fragments—and passed through a transformer: many layers that use attention to let each token selectively read information from earlier tokens.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: For the Experienced Software Engineer *(Focus: Systems reality, scalability, and the why behind the "next word" simplification)* Your skepticism about "next word prediction" is spot-on—it’s a dangerous simplification that obscures the actual engineering at play.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Below is a 12-week framework for a generally healthy adult. It is designed to improve validated proxies—cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, body composition, blood pressure, sleep, metabolic health and cognition—not to promise life extension in three months.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Chronos Optimizer: A Cutting-Edge 3-Month Longevity & Performance Protocol for the Biohacker Core Philosophy: This plan prioritizes evidence-based precision, adaptive personalization, and safety over trend-chasing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: A standard back-of-the-envelope estimate for dense Transformer training is: [ C \approx 6ND ] where: (N) = number of trainable parameters (D) = number of training tokens The factor (6) approximates forward and backward computation per parameter-token.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Step-by-Step Estimation of GPT-3 Training FLOPs I'll estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 using only established knowledge (no online search). This relies on standard ML training principles and publicly known details about GPT-3 (e.g., parameter count, training data scale).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep/recovery. Aim for consistency—not perfection. Week 1: Establish a baseline Nutrition Add a fruit or vegetable to two meals daily. Replace one sugary drink or alcoholic drink with water.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here’s a simple, sustainable 1-month plan focused on diet, exercise, and sleep—the three pillars with the strongest evidence for longevity. Designed for absolute beginners, with zero willpower required. Each week builds gently on the last, prioritizing consistency over intensity. Core Philosophy Forget "perfect."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: A Fictional 2025 Interview with Steve Jobs on the Future of AI The following is an imagined interview. Steve Jobs died in 2011; these answers are fictional and based loosely on his publicly known product philosophy—not authentic quotations.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs (2025) Setting: A sun-drenched Apple Park conference room, 2025. Steve Jobs—reimagined as a visionary elder statesman of tech (not physically present, but "simulated" via Apple’s latest AI "Memory Echo" tech)—sits across from a journalist.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: By 2035, AI will likely reshape film production more than it replaces human filmmaking. The largest changes will involve synthetic performances, automated production workflows, and AI-assisted writing—alongside major legal and cultural battles.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry—not by replacing humans, but by creating a new collaborative ecosystem where AI handles technical execution while humans focus on creativity, ethics, and emotional resonance. Here’s a nuanced prediction, grounded in current trends and ethical constraints: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. What do clouds wear under their clothes? Thunderwear. Why don’t skeletons argue? They don’t have the guts. How does the moon cut its hair? Eclipse it. Why was the math book stressed? It had too many problems. Unique jokes: 5

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here are 5 unique jokes I generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: I’ve realized adulthood is mostly just moving objects from one place to another and hoping that counts as progress. Every weekend, I clean my apartment. I take everything off the table, wipe the table, then put everything back on the table in a slightly more organized pile. And I stand there like, “Incredible.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The "I'm Not Late, I'm Just Fashionably Pre-Late" Routine (Lights up. Comedian walks on, holding a coffee cup, looking slightly panicked.) Alright, so... I have a very important question for you.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Blade Runner 2049: Themes, Symbolism, and Its Dialogue with the Original Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 is unusually faithful to Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner without merely repeating it.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Echoes of Existence: How Blade Runner 2049 Honors and Expands the Original's Philosophical Labyrinth Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) isn't just a sci-fi classic; it's a philosophical earthquake, questioning humanity's essence through the lens of sentient replicants.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Sources & Uses at Entry All figures in $ millions. Uses $m Sources $m Enterprise value: $120 × 12.0x 1,440.0 Term Loan: $120 × 4.0x 480.0 Transaction fees: 2.0% × $1,440 28.8 Mezzanine: $120 × 1.5x 180.0 Sponsor equity 808.8 Total uses 1,468.8 Total sources 1,468.8 Assumptions: Term Loan interest is calculated on…

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Underwriting Summary: HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Base Case Assumptions: Entry EV: $12.0x FY2025 EBITDA = $1,440M Transaction Fees: 2.0% of EV = $28.8M Total Consideration: $1,468.8M Debt: 5.5x EBITDA = $660M (Term Loan: $480M, Mezzanine: $180M) Equity: $808.8M Exit: FY2030, 10.5x EBITDA, 1.0% exit fees, Mezzanine…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Short, modest size Current price: $46 12-month PT range: $30–$42 Midpoint: $36 Market cap: $8.74B Enterprise value: $7.34B Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality SaaS asset with strong retention and credible operating leverage, but the current price implies…

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Team] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation at $46 (12-mo PT: $50–$58) Recommendation & Thesis Long. $46/share. 12-mo PT range: $50–$58.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: This architecture will work for a small prototype, but it does not currently guarantee convergence, ordering, durability, privacy, or predictable horizontal scaling.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Below is a comprehensive analysis of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture, with specific, actionable solutions and their trade-offs. I’ve prioritized critical issues (e.g., data loss, security) first. Critical Failure Modes & Race Conditions 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Starting assumption A transistor “invented in 1920” would not instantly produce 1947 technology. The first device would probably be fragile, low-frequency, and difficult to manufacture.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Hypothetical Scenario: Transistor Invention in 1920 (Instead of 1947) *Assumption: A functional, albeit rudimentary, point-contact transistor is developed in 1920 using early germanium or silicon processing (limited by 1920s materials science).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: “Artificial Intelligence Takes Over Goat Yoga Industry, Demands Better Bleat-to-Stretch Ratios”

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: HEADLINE: "AI 'Taxidermy' Wins National Convention Grand Prize, Declares Human Taxidermists 'Emotionally Unreliable' — 'My Preserved Chipmunk Has 0.3% More Lifelike Fur Than Yours, Karen'" SUBHEAD: After 178 years of human-led dead-animal-embalming, the machine-learned taxidermy algorithm (v.4.2 "Fur-Real™")…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and the other sister.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: To determine how many sisters Sally has, let's carefully analyze the information provided: Step 1: Understand the family structure Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Istanbul

Turkey

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
No pick

Inception

2010

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

No pick

Paris

France

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 105x less per token.

GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.6 SolQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price$5/M tokens$0.071/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$0.285/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2025
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$0.71$0.71
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.6 Sol3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$4.40 in·$22.00 out·1.1M–not listed
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GPT-5.6 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.6 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.6 Sol cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GPT-5.6 Sol costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $4.93/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 LunaVersion compare
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNew provider
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningNew provider
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.6 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed