Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-6 LunavsLlama 4 Scout
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6 LunavsLlama 4 Scout

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper than Llama 4 Scout at $0.1/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

GPT-6 Luna and Llama 4 Scout compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$0.5/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens10.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Apr 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-6 Luna113 words
Crispy Parmesan Chickpeas A crunchy, savory snack with a cheesy finish Ingredients (7): 1 can chickpeas, drained and dried 1 tablespoon olive oil ½ teaspoon salt ½ teaspoon paprika ¼ teaspoon garlic powder ¼ cup grated Parmesan 1 tablespoon lemon juice Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 30–35 minutes Instructions: Heat…
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout256 words
Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Cinnamon Swirl Bread Bites Ingredients: 1 cup all-purpose flour 1/2 cup granulated sugar 1/4 teaspoon ground cinnamon 1/4 teaspoon salt 1/4 cup unsalted butter, melted 1 large egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract Instructions: Preheat oven…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-6 Luna2,040 words
This agreement is strongly one-sided. The enforceability of particular terms—especially the non-compete, liability provisions, and arbitration clause—depends on the governing law and the facts. The agreement does not identify a governing law, which is itself a significant gap.
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout1,154 words
Analysis of Potentially Exploitative Clauses and Suggested Modifications The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below, we identify these clauses, suggest specific modifications, and provide the legal reasoning behind these suggestions.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GPT-6 Luna1,930 words
I would not wait six months for more data. A potentially fatal signal affecting a drug used by millions requires immediate safety assessment, prompt engagement with regulators, and a plan to inform patients and clinicians.
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout366 words
This response outlines a comprehensive plan to address the situation in the next 48 hours, considering legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GPT-6 Luna1,472 words
The most important caveat is that inventing a transistor is not the same as inventing the modern semiconductor industry. A device demonstrated in 1920 might be a crude, low-power, unreliable point-contact transistor.
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout818 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the implications would have been far-reaching and multifaceted. Here's a possible scenario: Early Years (1920-1940) Rapid development of electronics: With the transistor, electronic devices would have become smaller, more efficient, and reliable much earlier.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-6 Luna405 words
All figures in $m. Assumptions: annual Term Loan amortization is 1% of original principal ($4.8m); cash interest is based on beginning-of-year balances; Mezz PIK compounds annually.
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout1,051 words
Step 1: Calculate the purchase price and transaction fees The purchase price is 12.0x EBITDA, where EBITDA is $120m. So, the purchase price is $120m * 12.0 = $1440m. Transaction fees are 2.0% of the enterprise value, which is $1440m * 2.0% = $28.8m.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-6 Luna1,874 words
12-week longevity and performance plan This plan is for a generally healthy adult who wants to improve fitness, metabolic health, sleep, and cognitive performance—not a substitute for medical care or a promise to slow aging.
Read the full answer
Llama 4 Scout688 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1: Assessment and Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Wearable Tracking: Utilize a high-resolution wearable device (e.g., Garmin Forerunner 945, Apple Watch Series 7) to track: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Sleep stages and duration Physical activity and exercise…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6 Luna has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna
Input
$0.10
2.5× cheaper
Output
$0.50
Llama 4 Scout
Input
$0.25
Output
$0.50
Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-6 Luna3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1.1M·88.4% upOpenAI$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1.1M·99.9% upAmazon Bedrock$0.11 in·$0.55 out·1.1M·99.8% up
Llama 4 Scout3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·328k·99.9% upNNovitabf16$0.18 in·$0.59 out·131k·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.25 in·$0.70 out·1.3M—

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-6 Luna is developed by OpenAI while Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI. GPT-6 Luna has a 1.1M token context window vs Llama 4 Scout's 10.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-6 Luna and Llama 4 Scout each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.1/M input tokens and Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens. GPT-6 Luna is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6 Luna and Llama 4 Scout across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-6 Luna logoSolar Mini 4 logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoCommand A+ logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
Llama 4 Scout logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 MaverickVersion compare
Llama 4 Scout logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
GPT-6 Luna logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
GPT-6 Luna vs MiniMax M2.7Same size
Llama 4 Scout logoMiniMax M3 logo
Llama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3New provider
GPT-6 Luna logoMistral Large logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Mistral LargeSame size
GPT-6 Luna logoMistral Large 2 logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Mistral Large 2Same size

Model pages

GPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-6 Luna20 outputs, specs and price
Llama 4 Scout logo
Llama 4 Scout58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed