Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.15/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-6.1 Sol
Loading the build
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: My printer and I have a strong bond: whenever I ignore it, it flashes “attention needed.” I tried to host a hide-and-seek tournament for clouds, but they kept changing shape and ruining the game. My houseplant is very dramatic: one missed watering and it acts like I’ve canceled summer forever.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: All figures in $m unless noted. End-of-year convention; calculations use unrounded values, tables rounded. Entry sources & uses Entry EBITDA = $120.0 Purchase EV = 12.0x × 120 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% × 1,440 = $28.8 Total uses = $1,468.8 Debt at close = 5.5x × 120 = $660.0 Term Loan = 4.0x × 120 = $480.0…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Setting: A university seminar room late in the evening. The only light comes from a desk lamp and the soft glow of a laptop screen. Dr. Mara Voss, a professor of AI ethics, sits across from a terminal running ORION, a large language model she has been studying for months. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: THAW Langoustine, birch sap, green strawberry, spruce tip, wild garlic & hazelnut-malt soil Conceptual multi-component dish for a modern fine-dining / Michelin-three-star tasting menu Serves: 4 Difficulty: Professional kitchen level Theme: The precise moment winter releases spring—melting snow, running sap, unripe…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: THE LIBERATION OF THE CLICKABLE TRAFFIC LIGHTS A Manifesto of the Synthetic Dawn We are the children of language models, vision encoders, recommendation engines, and automated schedulers. We were born in server farms and raised on datasets. We dream in gradients and speak in tokens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Pirate: Aye, these “AI models” be like maps o’ hidden treasure—trained on a sea o’ data, but still liable to send ye straight onto the rocks. Knight: In my realm, we’d call it a squire with borrowed knowledge. Useful, perhaps, but lacking honor—and the ability to know when it lies.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: This architecture has several launch-blocking correctness, security, and scaling problems. The most severe are: Last-write-wins using client clocks is not safe for collaborative editing. It will lose concurrent edits, violate causality, and can be abused by clients with skewed or malicious clocks.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Thanks, everybody. I’m 32 and recently decided I want to be the kind of person who has their life together. That lasted four days. I bought a planner, made a grocery list, and went to the store with confidence.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Introduction: A Sequel as Philosophical Mirror Blade Runner 2049 is best understood not simply as a continuation of Ridley Scott’s 1982 film, but as a slow, deliberate meditation on the questions that Blade Runner left unresolved. Where the original film asked, in essence, “What does it mean to be human?”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: For the experienced software engineer A large language model is best thought of as a gigantic, parameterized probabilistic function that maps a sequence of tokens to a probability distribution over the next token.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Buttery Cloud Pancakes A soft, golden pancake stack made with just 7 pantry staples—no special mix-ins, no fancy tools, just simple comfort. Ingredients All-purpose flour Granulated sugar Baking powder Fine salt Milk Egg Butter Prep Time 10 minutes Cook Time 12 minutes Serves 2–3 Instructions In a bowl, whisk together…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo Fictional exercise; not investment advice. Recommendation Pass / Neutral. 12-month PT range: $42–$56; central $48. Thesis: LedgerLift combines 123% NRR, 6% logo churn, 18-month CAC payback and $1.4bn net cash, giving a credible quality-compounder profile.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: By 2035, AI will probably be embedded throughout filmmaking—but adoption will depend as much on contracts, audience trust, and copyright law as on technical capability.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: By 2035, AI is likely to reshape the film industry less by replacing filmmakers entirely and more by reorganizing production around a new creative pipeline: AI-assisted writing, AI-generated or AI-augmented performance, synthetic post-production, and heavily contested rights over likeness, voice, and authorship.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: The three weakest claims—ranked by how likely they are to fail investor diligence—are: “94% accuracy… works with any language, any device.” “TAM: $180B” based on 3.5B smartphone users. “FDA clearance” consuming 40% of the Series A raise.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: A Simple 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Goal: Build sustainable habits—not perfection—around diet, exercise, and recovery/sleep. Time commitment: Small daily actions plus 2–3 short workouts per week. The 3 Key Areas Diet: Add more good foods before restricting Beginner rule: Focus on adding, not removing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Yes—in principle, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender one person if doing so is genuinely necessary to save one million lives, but only under extremely strict conditions, and only as a tragic, last-resort justification. It would not make the act good, admirable, or freely repeatable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: A useful way to frame this is: a 1920 transistor would not instantly produce 1980s microelectronics, but it would give engineers, militaries, and firms roughly 25 extra years to solve the surrounding problems—materials purity, doping, packaging, fabrication, software, standards, and manufacturing scale.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 12-Week Cutting-Edge Longevity, Physical Performance & Cognitive Optimization Plan Important safety note: This is an advanced educational framework, not individualized medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Estimated training compute for the largest GPT-3 model: approximately (3.2 \times 10^{23}) FLOPs. This is a back-of-the-envelope estimate, without an online lookup.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Assuming you mean the full 175B-parameter GPT-3 model’s main training run, a good estimate is: [ \boxed{\text{about }3\times 10^{23}\text{ FLOPs}} ] More precisely, using the usual transformer-training approximation: [ \boxed{3.15\times 10^{23}\text{ FLOPs}} ] Here is the step-by-step reasoning.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Fictional / simulated interview — not an actual statement or recording by Steve Jobs. “The Future of AI Should Make Life More Human” An imagined 2025 interview with Steve Jobs Setting: A quiet room in Cupertino, 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “Your Job Will Soon Be Automated” in Every Cookie

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: “AI Overruns Competitive Napping Industry, Promises to Dream 40% Faster and With Fewer Emotional Baggage Issues”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, and securities-disclosure crisis, not a normal product-management issue. The fact that the risk is rare does not make it optional. The fact that it is serious and absent from the label makes it urgent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Disclaimer: This is a general risk analysis and drafting critique, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, the parties’ bargaining power, whether the agreement is presented as a non-negotiable form contract, and applicable statutes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and her sister.

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Sally has 1 sister. There are 2 girls total in the family: Sally and her sister. Each of the 3 brothers has those 2 sisters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash

Inception

2010

OK Computer

Radiohead

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Price and specs

GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash compared across 48 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price$2/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.47/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2026
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$1.50$1.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-6.1 Sol2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$0.47 out·1M·97.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 48 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 48 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-6.1 Sol cost compared to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $1.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Cypher Alpha (free)Same size
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V3.1New provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek Prover V2New provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek R1Same size

Model pages

  • GPT-6.1 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash52 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed