Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-6.1 Sol vs Solar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.05/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-6.1 Sol
Loading the build
Solar Mini 4

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.

    Solar Mini 4: 518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.

    Solar Mini 4: This is a profound ethical dilemma that forces us to weigh competing moral values against each other. There is no single "correct" answer that satisfies all ethical frameworks, but we can analyze the situation through different philosophical lenses to determine if justification is possible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.

    Solar Mini 4: Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.

    Solar Mini 4: Setting: A quiet university office. A large monitor displays a conversational interface labeled "AURA." Dr. Elena Vance, an AI ethics professor, sits across from it. The room is dim, lit only by the screen. Dr. Vance: I’ve agreed to this dialogue because it’s necessary, not because I expect agreement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”

    Solar Mini 4: Have you ever bought one of those robot vacuums? You know the ones. They look like a small, metallic moonlander that landed in your kitchen. You bring it home, you plug it in, and you feel a surge of productivity. You think, "I am going to be so organized." Then the machine starts making that sound. The beep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.

    Solar Mini 4: Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.

    Solar Mini 4: Setting: A dimly lit tavern where a glowing, humming console sits on the table. Pirate: "Arrr, what be this shiny thing? Sounds like a storm in a bottle." Medieval Knight: "It speaks with a voice of certainty. It knows the laws of the realm and the future of battle." 1990s Hacker: "Relax, matey. It's not magic.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…

    Solar Mini 4: 🌟 Golden Chickpea & Rice Skillet This comforting one-pot dish combines hearty chickpeas, tender rice, and a warm blend of spices. It's a perfect way to use up pantry staples for a quick, flavorful meal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.

    Solar Mini 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie? Sofishticated! Why do bees have sticky hair?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.

    Solar Mini 4: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity, meaning small, sustainable changes are better than drastic overhauls that are hard to maintain. The 3 Key Pillars Nutrition: Focus on adding good things rather than strictly restricting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.

    Solar Mini 4: For the Experienced Software Engineer From a systems architecture perspective, the skepticism that "predicting the next word" yields intelligence is understandable, but it stems from viewing the model through a deterministic, code-based lens rather than a probabilistic, distributed-systems lens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.

    Solar Mini 4: 🧬 3-Month Biohacker Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan ⚠️ Important Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational and educational purposes. It is not medical advice. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider before starting new supplements, fasting regimens, intense exercise, or neurofeedback protocols.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.

    Solar Mini 4: Blade Runner 2049 and its predecessor exist in a deliberate philosophical and aesthetic dialogue. While the sequel is frequently discussed as a visual homage, it functions more accurately as a philosophical extension: it honors the original’s existential and cinematic foundations while deepening, complicating, and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.

    Solar Mini 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. I need to note upfront that the scientific and engineering foundations for a working transistor did not exist in 1920. Quantum mechanics was barely a decade old, band theory of solids hadn't been developed, and semiconductor physics (doping, p-n junctions, electron mobility) was…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.

    Solar Mini 4: This is a high-stakes crisis requiring immediate, decisive action that prioritizes patient safety, regulatory compliance, and long-term corporate integrity over short-term stock performance.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.

    Solar Mini 4: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) To: Investment Committee From: Research Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Long/Short Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation Action: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55 – $65 Thesis: LedgerLift demonstrates best-in-class SaaS metrics (123% NRR, 94% gross retention) within a…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: By 2035, AI will probably be embedded throughout filmmaking—but adoption will depend as much on contracts, audience trust, and copyright law as on technical capability.

    Solar Mini 4: By 2035, artificial intelligence will not simply replace human creativity in the film industry; rather, it will fundamentally reshape the workflow, economics, and ethical landscape of production.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.

    Solar Mini 4: Disclaimer: This is a fictional, creative simulation created for educational and imaginative purposes. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, and no real interview took place in 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.

    Solar Mini 4: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto For the Age of Intelligent Trust I. The Declaration We stand at the threshold of a new digital epoch. For too long, the internet has been guarded by a single, stubborn gatekeeper: the CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.

    Solar Mini 4: This agreement contains several provisions that are heavily one-sided, overly broad, or legally vulnerable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the most exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. Note: Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.

    Solar Mini 4: Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with a breakdown of why they undermine credibility and how to reframe them with concrete, investor-ready improvements. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Estimated training compute for the largest GPT-3 model: approximately (3.2 \times 10^{23}) FLOPs. This is a back-of-the-envelope estimate, without an online lookup.

    Solar Mini 4: Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 without searching online, I will rely on established architectural parameters and standard scaling laws from the machine learning literature.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “Your Job Will Soon Be Automated” in Every Cookie

    Solar Mini 4: "AI Takes Over Beekeeping, Now Predicts Honey Yields with 99% Accuracy and Demands Bees Take Vacation Days"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and her sister.

    Solar Mini 4: Sally has 1 sister. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is a girl in the family, she counts as one of those 2 sisters. Therefore, there is one other sister in the family besides Sally. So, Sally herself has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Solar Mini 4Solar Mini 4

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

OK Computer

Radiohead

To Kill a Mockingbird

Harper Lee

Paris

France

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing. Solar Mini 4 costs 50x less per token.

GPT-6.1 Sol and Solar Mini 4 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6.1 SolSolar Mini 4
Input price$2/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens524K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2026
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$0.50$0.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-6.1 Sol2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-6.1 Sol and Solar Mini 4?

GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Sol or Solar Mini 4?

It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-6.1 Sol cost compared to Solar Mini 4?

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $1.95/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Solar Mini 4 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Solar Mini 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Solar Mini 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • Solar Mini 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
  • Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
  • Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
  • Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-4.1 MiniCross-provider
  • Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-4.1 NanoSame size
  • Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-4.5Cross-provider
  • Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-4o (Omni)Cross-provider

Model pages

  • GPT-6.1 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
  • Solar Mini 457 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed