What is the difference between GPT OSS 120B and Llama 4 Scout?

GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI while Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI. GPT OSS 120B has a 131K token context window vs Llama 4 Scout's 10.0M. in 36 community votes on Rival, GPT OSS 120B wins 79% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 53 challenges.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on 36 community votes on Rival, GPT OSS 120B wins 79% of head-to-head matchups against Llama 4 Scout. GPT OSS 120B is strongest in Web Design, Image Generation.

How much does GPT OSS 120B cost compared to Llama 4 Scout?

GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens and Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens. GPT OSS 120B is $0.07/M cheaper per input. GPT OSS 120B also wins more often in community votes, making it the better value.

How are GPT OSS 120B vs Llama 4 Scout votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 36 votes have been collected for this pair across 53 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

Updated Aug 2025

GPT OSS 120BvsLlama 4 Scout

GPT OSS 120B wins 79% of 36 blind community votes against Llama 4 Scout on Rival.

GPT OSS 120B and Llama 4 Scout compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GPT OSS 120B	Llama 4 Scout
Win rate	79%	21%
Input price	$0.18/M tokens	$0.25/M tokens
Output price	$0.8/M tokens	$0.5/M tokens
Context window	131K tokens	10.0M tokens
Parameters	117B (5.1B active)	17B active (109B total)
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Aug 2025	Apr 2025