GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max by Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT OSS 120B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max?
GPT OSS 120B and Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max are both competitive models. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max. Context windows: 131K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT OSS 120B and Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
GPT OSS 120B is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is from qwen. GPT OSS 120B has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max's 1000K. On pricing, GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max.
Per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B is cheaper on both — 14× input, 9.4× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT OSS 120B is 9.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT OSS 120B uses 1.5x more transitions
