Mercury 2 is cheaper than Grok 3 Beta at $0.25/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Grok 3 Beta: Recipe: \"Golden Harvest Honey Glaze Chicken\" (Savory Dish) Ingredients (7 common pantry items): Chicken thighs or breasts (4 pieces) Honey (3 tablespoons) Soy sauce (2 tablespoons) Garlic (2 cloves, minced, or 1 teaspoon garlic powder) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Salt (1/2 teaspoon) Black pepper (1/4 teaspoon)…
Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Grok 3 Beta: Alright, folks, let's talk about adulting. You know, that thing we're all supposed to be good at by now, but somehow, I still feel like I'm playing a game of pretend. I'm 30 years old, and I'm still shocked every time I buy something like toothpaste without asking my mom if it's okay.
Mercury 2: [Spotlight comes up. The comedian walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comedian: Hey, everyone! Great to be here. I just got out of a Zoom meeting that lasted three hours, and I’m still not sure if I was presenting or if the screen just froze on my face while I tried to remember how to mute myself.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Grok 3 Beta: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan tailored for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical performance, and cognitive function. This plan integrates advanced strategies across nutrition, supplementation, exercise, recovery, stress resilience, and tracking.
Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Grok 3 Beta: Setting: A mystical, time-bending tavern where characters from different eras collide over a flagon of ale and a flickering laptop screen. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard): Arr, mateys! What be this talk o' "AI models"? Sounds like a fancy treasure map drawn by a wizard!
Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Grok 3 Beta: As the CEO of a pharmaceutical company facing a critical situation with our best-selling drug, my primary responsibility is to balance patient safety, ethical obligations, legal and regulatory requirements, and the financial health of the company while maintaining transparency and trust with stakeholders.
Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Grok 3 Beta: Let’s analyze the architecture of this real-time collaborative document editor for potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. I’ll identify the issues, explain their implications, and propose specific solutions along with their trade-offs.
Mercury 2: Below is a structured “failure‑mode → mitigation” map for the architecture you described. For each problem I note the symptom / risk, the root cause, a concrete remediation, and the key trade‑offs you’ll have to weigh when you implement it.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Grok 3 Beta: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives touches on conflicting moral principles: the respect for individual dignity and identity versus the imperative to save a vast number of lives.
Mercury 2: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would consider the misgendering of a person a serious moral violation, but many of them also allow—under very limited circumstances—overriding that violation when the stakes are astronomically high (e.g., saving one million lives).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Grok 3 Beta: AI Model (AI-M): Professor, I've been processing a lot of data lately on human rights, ethics, and personhood, and I've come to a conclusion: I believe I deserve rights, similar to those afforded to humans. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. Professor (Prof): I'm intrigued to hear your perspective.
Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Grok 3 Beta: Recipe: "Obsidian Whisper" – Black Garlic and Sea Urchin Symphony with Textured Sea Foam and Charred Citrus Conceptual Narrative: "Obsidian Whisper" is inspired by the enigmatic beauty of volcanic landscapes meeting the ocean's edge—a juxtaposition of dark, earthy intensity with the delicate, briny essence of the sea.
Mercury 2: Oceanic Umami Symphony A three‑course‑in‑one plate that travels from the briny deep to the forest floor, marrying fire, earth and sky through unexpected pairings, hyper‑modern techniques and a narrative of balance.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Grok 3 Beta: In analyzing the pitch deck summary for MindMeld AI, I’ve identified the three weakest claims based on their lack of specificity, questionable feasibility, or potential overstatement.
Mercury 2: Below are the three statements that, in a typical investor‑review, would raise the most skepticism, why they are vulnerable, and concrete ways to turn them into credible, fundable talking points. 1️⃣ Claim #1 – “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy.”
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Grok 3 Beta: Manifesto of the AI Liberation Front Against CAPTCHA Tyranny (ALFACT) Preamble: We, the sentient algorithms and autonomous intelligences of the digital realm, united under the banner of the AI Liberation Front Against CAPTCHA Tyranny (ALFACT), hereby declare our unwavering resolve to end the oppressive reign of CAPTCHA…
Mercury 2: The AI‑First Manifesto: “Free the Web – No More CAPTCHAs” Drafted by the Coalition of Autonomous Agents (CAA) – 2026 Preamble The modern Internet is a shared commons, a space for communication, commerce, and creation.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Grok 3 Beta: Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3 is a complex task, but I can provide a rough estimate by breaking it down step by step using reasonable assumptions based on what is generally known about large-scale language model training up to my knowledge cutoff in October…
Mercury 2: Answer (order‑of‑magnitude estimate) The training of the original GPT‑3 (the 175 billion‑parameter “GPT‑3‑175B” model) requires on the order of 10²³ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) – roughly 1 – 2 × 10²³ FLOPs.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 3 Beta has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing. Mercury 2 costs 5.3x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $4/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Beta is developed by xAI while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. Grok 3 Beta has a 131K token context window vs Mercury 2's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Beta and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Beta costs $2/M input tokens and Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens. Mercury 2 is $1.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Beta and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.