Hunter Alpha is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hunter Alpha has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI while Hunter Alpha is developed by OpenRouter. Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 131K token context window vs Hunter Alpha's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 9 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Mini Beta and Hunter Alpha each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 9 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens and Hunter Alpha costs $0/M input tokens. Hunter Alpha is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Mini Beta and Hunter Alpha across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.