Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0.08/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 4.0x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.08/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $0.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is developed by NVIDIA. Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 131K token context window vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Mini Beta and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.08/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is $0.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Mini Beta and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.