Grok 3 Thinking vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Grok 3 Thinking by xAI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Grok 3 Thinking or Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 3 Thinking and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Grok 3 Thinking and Llama 4 Maverick
Grok 3 Thinking is made by xai while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Grok 3 Thinking has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K.
API pricing
Per 1M tokens
Grok 3 Thinking
Input
—
Output
—
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Grok 3 ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
76%
Llama 4 Maverick uses 2.4x more lists
Grok 3 Thinking
Llama 4 Maverick
46%Vocabulary42%
19wSentence Length24w
1.11Hedging0.76
3.3Bold3.7
2.6Lists6.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.64Headings0.74
0.25Transitions0.11
Based on 6 + 12 text responses
FAQ
