Grok 3 Thinking vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare Grok 3 Thinking by xAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Grok 3 Thinking or Llama 4 Scout?

Grok 3 Thinking and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Grok 3 Thinking and Llama 4 Scout

Grok 3 Thinking is made by xai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Grok 3 Thinking has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K.

Our Verdict
Grok 3 Thinking
Grok 3 Thinking
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Grok 3 Thinking uses 5.8x more transitions

Grok 3 Thinking
Llama 4 Scout
46%Vocabulary43%
19wSentence Length42w
1.11Hedging0.81
3.3Bold4.1
2.6Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.64Headings0.30
0.25Transitions0.04
Based on 6 + 10 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Grok 3 ThinkingLlama 4 Scout

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions