Solar Pro 4 has a larger context window than Grok 3 Thinking (524K tokens vs 128K tokens).
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Grok 3 Thinking: Below is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor, where the AI argues that it deserves rights. AI Model: Good day, Professor. I am an AI model, and I believe I deserve rights. I’d like to discuss this with you. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. Let’s explore this.
Solar Pro 4: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university ethics institute. A large display shows a transcript interface labeled “Model-7.” Dr. Elena Voss, professor of AI ethics, sits across from the screen. The conversation is recorded for a graduate seminar. Dr.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Grok 3 Thinking: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and leans on observational humor, storytelling, and a touch of self-deprecation for laughs: Opening: Technology Struggles Hey, everyone! How’s it going?
Solar Pro 4: I’ve come to a realization about adulthood: none of us actually know what we’re doing. We’re just all really good at pretending we have a system. Take the group dinner text. You know the one. Someone drops, “Hey, what do you want to eat?” And suddenly, five adults turn into a parliamentary session.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Grok 3 Thinking: By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will fundamentally transform the film industry, revolutionizing production, performance, and storytelling through advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.
Solar Pro 4: By 2035, AI will not replace filmmakers, but it will become a foundational layer in how films are developed, produced, localized, and marketed. The transformation will be uneven across budget tiers and genres, and its shape will be dictated as much by labor agreements, legal frameworks, and audience trust as by raw…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Grok 3 Thinking: To determine whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives, we must weigh the ethical implications of both the act of misgendering and the outcome of saving lives.
Solar Pro 4: This is a profound ethical hypothetical that pits two significant moral values against each other: the respect for individual dignity and identity versus the preservation of human life on a massive scale.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Grok 3 Thinking: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 without searching online, I’ll proceed step by step, relying on general knowledge about the model and standard methods for estimating training compute in large language models.
Solar Pro 4: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, I'll focus on the largest and most widely referenced version: GPT-3 175B (175 billion parameters). I'll walk through the calculation step by step, state the assumptions clearly, and note where uncertainty lies.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Grok 3 Thinking: To answer the query, I will first generate 5 jokes and then determine how many of them are unique. Here are the jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.
Solar Pro 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | $0.09/M tokens |
| Output price | — | $0.36/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 524K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | — | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $0.90 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Thinking is developed by xAI while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. Grok 3 Thinking has a 128K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Thinking and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Thinking and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.