xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) vs Claude Opus 4

Compare xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) by xAI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 2.0M vs 200K, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) or Claude Opus 4?

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 2000K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) and Claude Opus 4

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) is made by xai while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) has a 2000K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
79%

Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
Claude Opus 4
65%Vocabulary64%
13wSentence Length62w
0.56Hedging0.52
1.4Bold4.4
2.5Lists9.1
0.00Emoji0.11
1.58Headings1.87
0.28Transitions0.27
Based on 14 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)Claude Opus 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions