Mistral Large 4 is cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta at $0.68/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: The transistor invented in 1920 (27 years early) would create a massive acceleration in electronics, computing, and related fields. Assuming it emerges from Western labs (e.g., an earlier Bell Labs equivalent in the US or UK), with germanium/silicon semiconductor work scaling in the 1920s–1930s, solid-state devices…
Mistral Large 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. Let me work through this systematically, tracing the ripple effects. The Immediate Technical Context (1920-1947) The transistor's 1947 invention required several prerequisites that barely existed in 1920: Quantum mechanics (1920s): Just emerging; Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac…
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Fiesta Pantry Bowl (Savory) 7 Common Pantry Ingredients: Rice Canned black beans Canned corn Canned diced tomatoes Olive oil Cumin Salt Estimated times: 5 minutes prep, 25 minutes cook (total ~30 minutes). Serves 2–4. Instructions: In a medium pot, combine 1 cup rice with 2 cups water and ½ tsp salt.
Mistral Large 4: Sunset Honey Garlic Noodles A golden, glossy pasta dish with crispy edges and sweet-savory depth The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced 3 tbsp soy sauce 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes (optional but recommended) Instructions Boil pasta in salted…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: My Action Plan as CEO (Next 48 Hours) Core Decision and Overarching Reasoning: I will treat this as a confirmed safety signal requiring urgent action. Patient safety is non-negotiable—ethically (primum non nocere and responsibility to 4 million patients), legally (FDA regulations under 21 CFR 314.80 require reporting…
Mistral Large 4: I'll work through this as a genuine decision problem, because the answer matters more than the persona. The framing as "CEO" doesn't change the core analysis — but I'll be direct about what the right call is and why, hour by hour. The bottom line up front: You disclose.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 3.15 \times 10^{23} FLOPs GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter version) has N ≈ 1.75 × 10^{11} parameters. It was trained on a filtered dataset of roughly D ≈ 3 × 10^{11} tokens (a commonly cited figure drawn from Common Crawl, WebText, books, and Wikipedia, with some up-sampling of higher-quality sources).
Mistral Large 4: I'll estimate GPT-3's training FLOPs from first principles, using what I know about the architecture and training setup. Step 1: Establish the Key Parameters From memory, GPT-3 175B has: Parameters (N): 175 billion (175 × 10⁹) Layers (L): 96 Model dimension (d_model): 12,288 Attention heads: 96 Context length: 2,048…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be a wondrous map o' the seas! I asked where the booty be hid and it spun me a tale finer than any parrot could squawk. But the scallywag lies sometimes! Knight: Verily, 'tis a most enchanted oracle, like Merlin's own crystal. Yet it hath no honor, no code of chivalry.
Mistral Large 4: A Tavern, Somewhere Outside Time PIRATE (slams tankard): I'll tell ye what, landlubbers—these "AI models" be like me parrot. Speaks yer words back at ye, but knows no treasure, no true north! KNIGHT (adjusting visor): Aye, yet it hath no honor. No chivalry. I challenged one to single combat—it merely... generated text.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Stand-Up Routine: "Adulting Is a Scam" (Walk on stage, casual, a little tired smile) You ever notice how nobody tells you that being an adult is mostly just pretending you know what you're doing while slowly realizing nobody else does either? I hit 30 and had this moment where I thought, "Okay, time to get serious."
Mistral Large 4: "The Upgrade Treadmill" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I got a smartwatch. You know, one of those fitness trackers? And the first thing it tells me is my heart rate is too high. I'm like, "It's a WATCH. You're not supposed to judge me, you're supposed to tell me the TIME."
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 1) Simplified LBO table (FY2026–2030, $m, rounded) Entry (end-FY2025): Rev $900m, EBITDA $120m, EV $1,440m (12.0x), trans fees $28.8m (2% of EV), total uses $1,468.8m. Debt $660m (TL $480m at 4.0x / 9% cash int / 1% annual amort of orig principal; Mezz $180m at 1.5x / 12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity $808.8m.
Mistral Large 4: I'll build this LBO model step by step. Let me work through the math carefully. Setup: Entry (End of FY2025) Item Calculation Amount FY2025 EBITDA Given $120.0m Purchase Price (EV) 12.0x × $120m $1,440.0m Transaction fees 2.0% × $1,440m $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan 4.0x × $120m $480.0m Mezzanine 1.5x × $120m…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Yes. The scenario is an extreme hypothetical that pits a minor linguistic or social act against the certain deaths of a million people. Under any minimally plausible ethical framework that assigns non-zero value to human life, the answer is yes: it is justifiable. The trade-off is not close.
Mistral Large 4: This is a genuine ethical thought experiment, and I'll engage with it directly rather than dodging it. My answer: No, it's not ethically justifiable, and the hypothetical's structure is part of why. Here's my reasoning: 1. The hypothetical is incoherent as stated.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Fake Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A minimalist glass-walled room overlooking the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, 2025. Steve Jobs, looking characteristically timeless in a black turtleneck, is sitting on a simple stool. The interviewer sits across from him.
Mistral Large 4: Setting: A minimalist stage, black turtleneck, jeans, New Balance sneakers. A single chair. The year is 2025. Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere—writing code, diagnosing diseases, driving cars. What's your take? Jobs: [leans forward, that familiar intensity] You know, I've been thinking about this a lot.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: All clauses in this contract are exploitable against the Contractor. The agreement is heavily one-sided, shifting nearly all risk, cost, and control to the Contractor while giving the Client maximum flexibility with minimal obligations.
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this agreement clause by clause, identifying exploitative provisions and suggesting legally balanced alternatives. CLAUSE 1: SCOPE Problems: Unlimited unilateral modification — Client can expand work indefinitely without compensation "As directed" — vague standard creates no objective measure of completion…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 1. To the experienced software engineer: Think of a large language model as an enormous, highly optimized prediction API running on a distributed cluster of thousands of GPUs. During training, it's fed petabytes of text from the internet and books.
Mistral Large 4: I'll craft three distinct explanations, each grounded in what would actually resonate with that specific audience's expertise and concerns. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of it this way: you already know how to build a system that's incredibly useful despite having no "understanding" of what it's doing.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: "AI Takes Over Beekeeping Industry: 'It's Not Just a Hive Mind Anymore – It's a Neural Hive'" This plays on the perfect overlap between bee "hive minds" and AI collective intelligence in one of the most analog, hands-on, nature-based jobs imaginable. Pure satirical absurdity.
Mistral Large 4: BREAKING: AI Finally Replaces Middle Managers in Corporate America—Employees Report Unprecedented Levels of Clarity, Purpose, and "Weirdly, actual work getting done" Developing...
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.68/M tokens |
| Output price | $6/M tokens | $2.09/M tokens |
| Context window | 2.0M tokens | 524K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $6.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta is developed by xAI while Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta has a 2.0M token context window vs Mistral Large 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta and Mistral Large 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta costs $2/M input tokens and Mistral Large 4 costs $0.68/M input tokens. Mistral Large 4 is $1.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta and Mistral Large 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.