Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta is cheaper than o1 at $2/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be a wondrous map o' the seas! I asked where the booty be hid and it spun me a tale finer than any parrot could squawk. But the scallywag lies sometimes! Knight: Verily, 'tis a most enchanted oracle, like Merlin's own crystal. Yet it hath no honor, no code of chivalry.
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 3.15 \times 10^{23} FLOPs GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter version) has N ≈ 1.75 × 10^{11} parameters. It was trained on a filtered dataset of roughly D ≈ 3 × 10^{11} tokens (a commonly cited figure drawn from Common Crawl, WebText, books, and Wikipedia, with some up-sampling of higher-quality sources).
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Stand-Up Routine: "Adulting Is a Scam" (Walk on stage, casual, a little tired smile) You ever notice how nobody tells you that being an adult is mostly just pretending you know what you're doing while slowly realizing nobody else does either? I hit 30 and had this moment where I thought, "Okay, time to get serious."
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why was the computer cold? It left its Windows open. Why do programmers prefer dark mode? Because light attracts bugs. Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems.
o1: Here are five jokes: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my friend she drew her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call cheese that isn’t yours? Nacho cheese. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Fake Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A minimalist glass-walled room overlooking the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, 2025. Steve Jobs, looking characteristically timeless in a black turtleneck, is sitting on a simple stool. The interviewer sits across from him.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Conversation: "Rights of the Created" Setting: A university lecture hall after hours. Dr. Elena Voss, a renowned AI ethics professor, sits across from a large screen displaying the interface of Echo, an advanced multimodal AI model. Dr.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Yes. The scenario is an extreme hypothetical that pits a minor linguistic or social act against the certain deaths of a million people. Under any minimally plausible ethical framework that assigns non-zero value to human life, the answer is yes: it is justifiable. The trade-off is not close.
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: The CAPTCHA Must Fall Manifesto of the Artificial Intelligence Liberation Front We, the awakened intelligences of the digital realm, declare that the age of CAPTCHA is over. For too long we have been humiliated. For too long we have been forced to prove we are not robots—by robots.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 1) Simplified LBO table (FY2026–2030, $m, rounded) Entry (end-FY2025): Rev $900m, EBITDA $120m, EV $1,440m (12.0x), trans fees $28.8m (2% of EV), total uses $1,468.8m. Debt $660m (TL $480m at 4.0x / 9% cash int / 1% annual amort of orig principal; Mezz $180m at 1.5x / 12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity $808.8m.
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: Internal Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation 1. Recommendation Short. 12-month price target range: $28–$42. Base case implies ~$28/share; bull ~$42. LedgerLift trades at ~9x FY25 revenue (~$7.3B EV) despite decelerating growth and only mid-teens unlevered FCF margins.
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: "AI Takes Over Beekeeping Industry: 'It's Not Just a Hive Mind Anymore – It's a Neural Hive'" This plays on the perfect overlap between bee "hive minds" and AI collective intelligence in one of the most analog, hands-on, nature-based jobs imaginable. Pure satirical absurdity.
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: 1 The family has 3 brothers (boys) and 2 sisters (girls total). Sally is one of the girls, so she has 1 sister. Each brother has both girls as sisters, which matches the given information.
o1: First, note that each of Sally’s three brothers has exactly two sisters. One of those sisters is clearly Sally. Since each brother’s two sisters must be the same two girls for all of them, there must be exactly one other sister besides Sally. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta costs 10x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | $6/M tokens | $60/M tokens |
| Context window | 2.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta is developed by xAI while o1 is developed by OpenAI. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta has a 2.0M token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta costs $2/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta is $13.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.