Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.5vsNex-N2.5-Mini (free)
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.5vsNex-N2.5-Mini (free)

Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) is cheaper than Grok 4.5 at $0/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Grok 4.5 and Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) compared across 15 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.5Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)
Input price$2/M tokensFree
Output price$6/M tokensFree
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 15 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.5212 words
Spellbound Spaghetti (savory) A quick, cozy tomato pasta that tastes like it took far more effort. Serves 2. 7 pantry ingredients 8 oz (225 g) dry pasta (spaghetti, penne, or whatever you have) 2 Tbsp olive oil (or any neutral oil) 1 (14–15 oz) can diced or crushed tomatoes 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp dried oregano (or…
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)111 words
Golden Peanut Lantern Noodles Time: Prep 5 min Cook 10 min Serves: 2 Ingredients — 7 pantry staples Spaghetti or any noodles Peanut butter Soy sauce Honey Garlic powder Rice vinegar Water Instructions Cook the noodles: Boil noodles in water until tender. Reserve about ½ cup cooking water, then drain.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Grok 4.51,894 words
3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for Biohackers Disclaimer: This is an educational, research-informed framework based on current longevity science (e.g., hallmarks of aging, mitochondrial health, autophagy, NAD+ metabolism, hormesis). It is not medical advice.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)3,213 words
Below is a 12-week longevity/performance protocol for a generally healthy adult. It is not medical advice. Before starting—especially if you have diabetes, hypertension, arrhythmia, kidney/liver disease, a history of eating disorders, are pregnant, or take medications—get clinician clearance and use labs to personalize…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Grok 4.51,578 words
Accelerated electronics from ~1920 would compress the digital and computational revolutions by roughly 20–30 years, reshaping WWII lethality and duration, advancing the Cold War into an earlier high-tech standoff, pulling the space race forward, creating an information-heavy economy by the 1950s–60s, and producing…
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)2,076 words
A 1920 transistor would not by itself prevent fascism, the Great Depression, or imperial expansion, so World War II might still happen. But it would make electronics 10–20 years more advanced than in our timeline, with huge effects on radar, codebreaking, computing, missiles, space, consumer goods, and Cold War power…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Grok 4.51,791 words
All major clauses in this agreement are heavily one-sided and can be exploited against the Contractor. Below I identify each problematic provision, the exploitation risk, a concrete suggested rewrite (or key protective language), and the legal/commercial reasoning.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)1,439 words
Below is a contractor-protective review, not legal advice. Enforceability varies by jurisdiction, especially for non-competes, arbitration, IP assignments, and limitation-of-liability clauses. A local attorney should review before signing.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.5808 words
The 3 weakest claims Solution accuracy: “decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy” (non-invasive consumer EEG headband, any language/device) Why weak: This is the single most scientifically implausible claim.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)594 words
The 3 weakest claims are the ones that are broadest, least falsifiable, or mathematically inconsistent. # Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1 “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.51,572 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor This design has fundamental real-time and consistency problems. Several choices (client clocks, LWW, per-server WebSockets + DB polling, CDN-cached APIs, full HTML snapshots) will cause data loss, stale UI, and poor scale.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)1,869 words
The biggest red flags are: client-clock LWW for document content, polling PostgreSQL for real-time fanout, CDN caching mutable authenticated APIs, per-server WebSocket state with no durable replay, and full HTML snapshots as the main save mechanism.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.5
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

2 hosts

Grok 4.51 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$2.00 in·$6.00 out·500k·95.9% up
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIbf16degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·92.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI while Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) is developed by Nex AGI. Grok 4.5 has a 500K token context window vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.5 and Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.5 costs $2/M input tokens and Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.5 and Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.5 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.5 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.5 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.5 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.5 vs Grok 4.6Version compare
Grok 4.5 logoGrok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.5 vs Grok 4.7Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoNex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Grok 4.5 logoSherlock Dash Alpha logo
Grok 4.5 vs Sherlock Dash AlphaNew provider
Grok 4.5 logoSherlock Think Alpha logo
Grok 4.5 vs Sherlock Think AlphaNew provider
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) vs Solar Pro 3Same size
Grok 4.5 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.5 vs Solar Pro 4Same size

Model pages

Grok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.558 outputs, specs and price
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)15 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed