xAI: Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare xAI: Grok 4.5 by xAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 500K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
xAI: Grok 4.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, xAI: Grok 4.5 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
xAI: Grok 4.5
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
28× cheaper
Output
$0.28
21× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 28× input, 21× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 7.5x more emoji
xAI: Grok 4.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
61%Vocabulary54%
16wSentence Length14w
0.23Hedging0.12
2.5Bold7.5
2.4Lists4.2
0.09Emoji0.68
0.48Headings0.93
0.06Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
