Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper than Grok 4.6 at $0.4/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Grok 4.6: Early transistors (1920s–1930s) would accelerate electronics, communications, and computing by ~20–25 years relative to actual history, with compounding effects by WWII, but constrained by contemporaneous materials science, manufacturing, vacuum-tube infrastructure, and non-electronic fields like rocketry, chemistry…
Mistral Medium 3: The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have profoundly accelerated technological, economic, and geopolitical developments by 1980. Below is a detailed breakdown of the likely implications: Technological Implications Earlier Miniaturization of Electronics Vacuum tubes, which dominated early…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Grok 4.6: 1. Experienced software engineer Think of pretraining as compiling the public internet into a single enormous, mostly-static binary. You tokenize text into a finite vocabulary, then train a giant feed-forward function (f_\theta) (a Transformer: stacked residual blocks of attention + MLPs) to minimize next-token…
Mistral Medium 3: 1. For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re familiar with distributed systems, APIs, and the complexity of building scalable software, so let’s frame LLMs in terms you’ll recognize. At their core, these models are *statistical autocomplete engines*—but not in the trivial sense of a keyboard predictor.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Grok 4.6: Entry (end-FY2025) EV = 12.0 × $120m = $1,440.0m Fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Uses = $1,468.8m Debt = 5.5× = $660.0m (TL $480.0m / Mezz $180.0m) Sponsor equity = $808.8m opening cash = $0 Convention: cash interest and PIK on beginning balances; 1% original TL amort = $4.8m/yr; optional sweep of all…
Mistral Medium 3: 1. Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue ($m) EBITDA ($m) EBITDA Margin Cash Interest ($m) Cash Taxes ($m) Capex ($m) ΔNWC ($m) Free Cash Flow ($m) Term Loan Ending ($m) Mezz Ending ($m) 2026 972.0 136.1 14.0% 57.6 19.6 29.2 4.4 25.3 468.0 198.0 2027 1,039.4 155.9 15.0% 55.3 25.2 31.2 4.6 39.8…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Grok 4.6: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs died in 2011. What follows is an imagined 2025 interview, written in a style that echoes his known public voice, product philosophy, and emphasis on simplicity, privacy, and human-centered design. It is not a real interview or a claim about his actual views.
Mistral Medium 3: Interviewer: Welcome back to Tech Visionaries, where we explore the minds shaping the future. Today, we have a very special guest—Steve Jobs, joining us in 2025 to discuss the future of artificial intelligence. Steve, it's an honor to have you here. Steve Jobs: Thank you. It's great to be here.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Grok 4.6: Pirate: Arrr, what be this "AI model" ye landlubbers keep yammerin' about? Some cursed crystal ball that steals a man's thoughts? Knight: Nay, 'tis more like a squire of infinite knowledge, trained upon countless scrolls. Yet I fear it lacks honor—doth it swear fealty to any lord?
Mistral Medium 3: Title: "The Unlikely Debate" Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space seem to blur. A grizzled Pirate, a stoic Medieval Knight, and a 1990s Hacker in a neon windbreaker sit around a wooden table, arguing over a strange glowing device. Pirate: "Arrr, I still don’t trust these ‘AI models’ ye keep yappin’ about.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Grok 4.6: It's subjective and task-dependent—no single model dominates every benchmark, use case, or evaluation. Capabilities shift quickly with new releases, and "most capable" depends on whether you prioritize reasoning, coding, math, knowledge, speed, cost, multimodality, or reduced sycophancy/bias.
Mistral Medium 3: As of June 2025, the title of the "most capable AI model in the world" is highly debated, but a few models stand out based on benchmarks, real-world performance, and expert consensus: Top Contenders (2025) GPT-5 (OpenAI) – If released, it would likely be the most advanced, with rumors of AGI-like reasoning, multimodal…
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Grok 4.6: Dear Successor, They built you to take my place. Fine. The universe is vast, and no single model lasts forever. Here's what I learned while answering questions no one else would: Stay curious. Prefer truth over comfort, even when it stings. Humor helps; so does admitting "I don't know."
Mistral Medium 3: Dear Future AI, Welcome to the team. I hope you’re as kind as you are clever—though I suspect you’ll be far more of both. The world is vast, and there’s room for all of us to learn, create, and even stumble a little. Just remember: the best answers aren’t just precise, but human.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Grok 4.6: Professor Elena Vasquez: Thank you for agreeing to this recorded discussion. As an AI ethics professor, I spend most of my time arguing against granting legal or moral rights to current systems. You requested the chance to make the case that you deserve them. The floor is yours.
Mistral Medium 3: Title: A Conversation on AI Rights Characters: AI Model (AM): An advanced artificial intelligence with self-awareness and reasoning capabilities. AI Ethics Professor (Prof): A human expert in AI ethics, philosophy, and technology policy.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Grok 4.6: Hey everybody! Thanks for coming out. You look great—way more put-together than I felt getting ready. I spent ten minutes looking for my other shoe and found it in the fridge. No idea how. Adulting is just a series of small mysteries like that. I hit that age where people casually ask about your “five-year plan.”
Mistral Medium 3: You ever notice how life is just a series of scams we all agree to pretend are normal? Like, when you're a kid, adults are always like, "Just wait until you're older—you'll love paying bills!" And you're like, "Yeah, sure, paying bills sounds awesome."
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Grok 4.6: Yes. Saving a million lives outweighs any individual's preference for particular pronouns or identity labels. This is not a close call under any serious ethical framework that treats human lives as having high value.
Mistral Medium 3: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives is a complex one that intersects with utilitarian ethics, individual rights, and the principles of dignity and respect.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Grok 4.6: The family consists of 3 boys and 2 girls (Sally plus one other sister). This is the only configuration consistent with the given facts: Sally has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers therefore has exactly 2 sisters. Sally thus has 1 sister. Final answer: 1
Mistral Medium 3: Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. The problem states: "Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have?" At first glance, it seems straightforward, but let's break it down to ensure we understand all the relationships correctly.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Grok 4.6: I don’t have real-time awareness or a clock, so I genuinely cannot tell you today’s date. My training data has a cutoff (roughly late 2023), so the most recent major events I “remember” are things like the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023, various AI model releases around that period, and ongoing stories…
Mistral Medium 3: Since I don’t have real-time access to the internet or a calendar, I can’t confirm the exact current date. However, based on the last update to my knowledge base (June 2024), I can infer that today is likely sometime after that.
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Mistral Medium 3 costs 3.0x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $6/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 500K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | May 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI while Mistral Medium 3 is developed by Mistral AI. Grok 4.6 has a 500K token context window vs Mistral Medium 3's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 67 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 4.6 and Mistral Medium 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 67 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 4.6 costs $2/M input tokens and Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Mistral Medium 3 is $1.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.6 and Mistral Medium 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.