Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4vsMuse Glimmer 30B
Updated Aug 2026

Grok 4vsMuse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0.3/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Grok 4 and Muse Glimmer 30B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4Muse Glimmer 30B
Input price$3/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window256K tokens131K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed30B
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Grok 41,426 words
Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B862 words
You have a patient safety issue, not a PR issue. The 6 month regulatory reporting timeline is the formal process, not the ethical or legal obligation to act now. Waiting for more data while patients continue to be exposed is criminal negligence exposure, not risk mitigation.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Grok 4899 words
Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B965 words
A 3-month longevity protocol is about stacking evidence-based interventions with tight feedback loops. This is an educational framework for biohacking enthusiasts, not medical advice. Supplements and protocols can interact with medications and health conditions.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4958 words
Explanation for an Experienced Software Engineer Imagine scaling up something as basic as your IDE's code autocompletion to handle the entire internet's worth of text—that's essentially what a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude does.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B525 words
1. For the experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a massive, stateless API with no rules, just a huge compressed lookup table learned from data. It learns by training a transformer — essentially a stack of attention layers — as a next-token predictor via gradient descent on trillions of tokens.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 41,551 words
Below, I'll systematically identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor. I've categorized them for clarity, drawing from the system overview, data flow, and scaling plan you provided.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B813 words
This architecture will work for a demo but will break badly under real concurrent use. Here are the critical failure modes, race conditions and bottlenecks: WebSocket fan-out is server-local Failure: Step 3 broadcasts only to clients on THAT server.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Grok 41,310 words
Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B1,004 words
A transistor in 1920 does not mean a 1947 transistor. It means a crude point-contact or junction device built with 1920s materials science, metallurgy, and manufacturing. That is still a game-changer.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4234 words
Recipe: Pantry Pirate's Tomato Tango This is a simple savory pasta dish that's hearty, flavorful, and perfect for a quick weeknight meal. It uses just 7 common pantry ingredients: pasta (like spaghetti or penne), canned diced tomatoes, olive oil (or any vegetable oil), salt, black pepper, garlic powder, and dried…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B321 words
Dish Name: "Midnight Pantry Pantry Hero Pasta" A creamy-ish, garlicky tomato pasta that tastes like you tried way harder than you did. All from the pantry, no fresh produce needed.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4
Grok 4
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Muse Glimmer 30B costs 13x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Muse Glimmer 30B
Input
$0.30
10× cheaper
Output
$1.20
13× cheaper

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on both: 10× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Muse Glimmer 30B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
PPhala$0.30 in·$1.10 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.30 in·$1.20 out·131k·100% upFFireworks$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·100% upTTogether$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4 is developed by xAI while Muse Glimmer 30B is developed by Meta AI. Grok 4 has a 256K token context window vs Muse Glimmer 30B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4 and Muse Glimmer 30B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens and Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.3/M input tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B is $2.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4 and Muse Glimmer 30B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4 logoGrok 4.7 logo
Grok 4 vs Grok 4.7Same lab
Grok 4 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6Version compare
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGPT-5 Nano logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5 NanoNew provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGPT-5 Pro logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5 ProNew provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGPT-5.1 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5.1New provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGPT-5.1 Chat logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5.1 ChatNew provider

Model pages

Grok 4 logo
Grok 457 outputs, specs and price
Muse Glimmer 30B logo
Muse Glimmer 30B13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed