Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B
Compare Grok Code Fast 1 by xAI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B by Qwen, in 23 community votes, qwen: qwen3.5 27b wins 86% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 256K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B?
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is the better choice overall, winning 86% of 23 blind community votes on Rival. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B. Context windows: 256K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B
Grok Code Fast 1 is made by xai while Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is from qwen. Grok Code Fast 1 has a 256K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B's 262K. On pricing, Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B. In community voting, In 23 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B wins 86% of head-to-head duels.
In 23 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B wins 86% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 23+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B. In 23 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B wins 86% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 uses 6.0x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
