Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Hy3vsLFM2.5-2.6B
Updated Aug 2026

Hy3vsLFM2.5-2.6B

LFM2.5-2.6B is cheaper than Hy3 at $0/M vs $0.132/M input tokens.

Hy3 and LFM2.5-2.6B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecHy3LFM2.5-2.6B
Input price$0.132/M tokensFree
Output price$0.528/M tokensFree
Context window262K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B1,248 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, fundamentally rewires the trajectory of the 20th century. The pivotal difference is not the year of invention, but the 23 years of head start provided for the semiconductor industry, the physics of solid-state electronics, and the subsequent digital revolution.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B1,719 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Failure Safety Issue Executive Summary This is a high-stakes crisis requiring immediate, decisive action that balances patient safety, legal compliance, financial responsibility, and ethical leadership.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Hy3816 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer (distributed systems/APIs, no ML, skeptical) You’re used to building systems where explicit logic, endpoints, and state machines handle requests.
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B798 words
For the Software Engineer At its core, a large language model is a massive neural network—a function approximator trained via gradient descent on a colossal corpus of text.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B693 words
This is a comprehensive, 3-month "Longevity Protocol" designed for a biohacker. It integrates chronobiology, metabolic engineering, neurocognitive optimization, and performance science.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B717 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they are problematic and how to fix them. The "Predict Before You Think" Claim (Slide 1) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B189 words
Dish Name: Sun-Kissed Spice Pasta Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Staples): Pasta (any shape, such as spaghetti or penne) Canned tomatoes (crushed or diced) Onion Garlic Olive oil Salt Red chili flakes (or red pepper flakes) Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes Instructions: Boil the Pasta…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
LFM2.5-2.6B
LFM2.5-2.6BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy3 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Hy3
Input
$0.13
Output
$0.53
LFM2.5-2.6B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.7% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·100% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up
LFM2.5-2.6B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Liquid AIfp8$0 in·$0 out·66k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Hy3 is developed by Tencent while LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI. Hy3 has a 262K token context window vs LFM2.5-2.6B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Hy3 and LFM2.5-2.6B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens and LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0/M input tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Hy3 and LFM2.5-2.6B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGLM 5.3 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Hy3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Granite 4.2 8BSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoNorth Mini Code logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini CodeSame size
Hy3 logoLlama 4 Scout logo
Hy3 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
Hy3 logoMercury logo
Hy3 vs MercuryNew provider
Hy3 logoMercury 2 logo
Hy3 vs Mercury 2New provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoMercury 2.5 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mercury 2.5New provider

Model pages

Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
LFM2.5-2.6B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B56 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed