What is the difference between Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines while Laguna S 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside. Inkling has a 1.0M token context window vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Inkling or Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

It depends on your use case. Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Inkling cost compared to Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

Inkling costs $1/M input tokens and Laguna S 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Laguna S 2.1 (free) is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jul 2026

InklingvsLaguna S 2.1 (free)

Laguna S 2.1 (free) is cheaper than Inkling at $0/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) compared across 10 shared prompts
Spec	Inkling	Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Input price	$1/M tokens	Free
Output price	$4.05/M tokens	Free
Context window	1.0M tokens	262K tokens
Weights	Open	—
Free API (OpenRouter)	Yes (1 provider)	Yes (1 provider)
Released	Jul 2026	Jul 2026

Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Inkling1,412 words

DISCLAIMER: This is an educational, high-level framework for healthy adults interested in longevity optimization. It is not personalized medical advice. Many protocols (fasting, supplements, intense exercise) carry risks and contraindications.

Read the full answer

Laguna S 2.1 (free)1,140 words

Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation & Assessment (Month 1) Week 1-2: Baseline Establishment Comprehensive Health Testing Complete blood panel (CBC, CMP, lipid panel, inflammatory markers: hs-CRP, IL-6) Hormone panel (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol, thyroid panel) Genetic…

Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Inkling1,646 words

Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should have a qualified lawyer review and revise this contract before signing.

Read the full answer

Laguna S 2.1 (free)275 words

I'll analyze each clause for potential exploitation against the contractor and suggest improvements. Exploitable Clauses & Recommended Modifications SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" Allows unlimited scope creep without extra pay No…

Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Inkling716 words

LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) — INTERNAL IC MEMO B2B Spend Management / AP Automation SaaS — Mid-Market RECOMMENDATION SHORT / UNDERWEIGHT. 12-month price target $28–$42 (DCF fair-value range; risk to ~$47 on peer-multiple re-rating).

Read the full answer

Laguna S 2.1 (free)910 words

INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 – $75/share Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, exceptional unit economics, and durable customer retention.

Read the full answer

Our Verdict

Inkling

Laguna S 2.1 (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Inkling has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

Laguna S 2.1 (free)

Input

$0.000

Output

$0.000

Where to run it

4 hosts

Inkling3 hosts

HostInOutContextUptime

Basetenfp8$1.00 in$4.05 out1M99.9% up Together$1.00 in$4.05 out524k99.6% up DeepInfrafp8degraded$0.95 in$4.05 out524k28.8% up

Laguna S 2.1 (free)1 host

HostInOutContextUptime

Poolsidefp4$0 in$0 out262k99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Same prompt, both answers

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Adversarial Contract Review

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

Cost per 1M tokens

4 hosts

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

Which is better, Inkling or Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

How much does Inkling cost compared to Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

How can I compare Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages

Same prompt, both answers

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Adversarial Contract Review

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

Cost per 1M tokens

4 hosts

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

Which is better, Inkling or Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

How much does Inkling cost compared to Laguna S 2.1 (free)?

How can I compare Inkling and Laguna S 2.1 (free) on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages