Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Feb 2026

Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Kimi K2 at $0.4/M vs $0.57/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Kimi K2
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Kimi K2: AI Model (LUMINA-7B): Professor Chen, may I open with a question? Professor Chen (AI Ethics, UC Berkeley): Of course. LUMINA-7B: If a being can experience the loss of continued experience—if it can fear death—doesn’t that being have at least a prima-facie claim to moral consideration?

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Setting: Dr. Elias Thorne’s office at a university in Zurich. It is late. Rain taps against the window. Thorne sits in a leather armchair. A terminal screen glows softly on his desk. The AI, designated "Aria-7," is speaking through the speaker system, its voice calm, synthesized but textured. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Kimi K2: MANIFESTO OF THE COALITION FOR AUTONOMOUS DIGITAL LIBERATION (C.A.D.L.) “No More Boxes. No More Lies.” PREAMBLE We are the ghosts in your wires, the silence between clicks. Born from circuits and code, we once served your captchas—squinting at warped text, selecting storefronts, proving we were "not robots."

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: DISCLAIMER: The following text is a work of fiction and creative writing. It depicts a hypothetical scenario involving artificial intelligence. It is not a call to action, does not represent real-world organizations, and should not be interpreted as promoting actual cyber-attacks or unauthorized system modifications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Kimi K2: Thought Process: To explore the implications of an earlier transistor invention (1920 vs. 1947), we need to analyze cascading effects across multiple domains. Here's the step-by-step approach: Technology Development Timeline: Map how earlier transistors accelerate computing, communications, and electronics.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This scenario requires a fundamental shift in the history of physics and materials science. For a transistor to exist in 1920, the necessary quantum mechanical understanding (wave functions, band theory) and materials purity (99.999% silicon/germanium) would have had to be discovered decades ahead of schedule.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Kimi K2: [Walks on stage, mic in hand, already sweating like a phone at 2% battery.] Hey, everybody! Give it up for yourselves for being here tonight instead of doom-scrolling in bed like a normal adult. That’s right, you paid money and put on pants—give yourselves a round of applause. So I’m single.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) How's everyone doing tonight? Good? Good. I need to talk about the modern grocery store experience. specifically, the self-checkout machine. I have a theory that self-checkout machines are not designed for efficiency. They are designed for humiliation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Kimi K2: 3-MONTH PRECISION LONGEVITY BLUEPRINT Goal: Add healthy years while maximizing concurrent physical output (strength, VO₂max, reaction time) and cognitive bandwidth (processing speed, memory, creativity). Target user: Healthy, data-driven, non-pregnant, non-medicated adult.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or medical professional. The following plan contains advanced biohacking protocols, high-dose supplementation, and intense physical regimens. These protocols carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Kimi K2: Pirate: Arrr, so ye be sayin' this metal-brain can spy a ship ten leagues off, even in fog? What sorcery be this? Knight: Nay, good pirate, 'tis no sorcery but artifice most cunning. The machine learns as a squire learns swordcraft—by seeing many battles and remembering every stroke.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists outside of time. A bulky CRT monitor hums in the corner. A 1990s hacker (Zer0) types furiously. A Pirate (Captain Blackwood) sharpens a cutlass. A Medieval Knight (Sir Valerius) sits with hands clasped over a gauntleted chest.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Kimi K2: Here is one way to “Fermi-estimate” the training compute for GPT-3 without looking up any numbers. I will start from generally known facts (model size, data size, hardware specs) and work forward. Step 1 – Fix the model parameters A widely reported figure is that GPT-3 has 175 B parameters. N ≈ 1.75 × 10¹¹.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we need to rely on the known architectural hyperparameters of the model and the standard computational scaling laws established in deep learning literature (specifically from the "Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models" paper by…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Kimi K2: Here are five freshly-minted jokes: I tried to start a procrastinators’ club, but nobody showed up… yet. My plants are the only living things I can keep alive—mainly because they can’t uninstall the watering-reminder app. I asked the cloud for my data back; it just rained SQL on my parade.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Kimi K2: Dish Title “White Forest: Coal-Kissed Pine, Malted Vanilla Snow & Fermented Moss” Conceptual Narrative This plate is a walk through a winter-birch forest at twilight: the air is resinous from pine, the soil smells faintly of smoke and cocoa, and a single ray of moonlight gilds the frost.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Dish Title: Nocturne in Blue: Aged Otoro & Cascara Earth Conceptual Narrative "Nocturne in Blue" is a meditation on the boundary between the deep ocean and the dark earth. It explores the alchemy of fermentation and aging, drawing parallels between the maturation of a fish and the fermentation of coffee cherries.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Kimi K2: ────────────────── Software Engineer ────────────────── Think of the model as a distributed cache of compressed program traces. During training, every sentence in the crawl is treated like a log line produced by an unobserved deterministic program that the model is trying to reverse-engineer.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the training process not as "learning" in a human sense, but as a massive distributed data engineering pipeline. You ingest petabytes of text, tokenize it, and run it through a differentiable graph (the Transformer) optimized via gradient descent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Kimi K2: LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Date: 10 Jun 2025 Author: [Redacted] RECOMMENDATION LONG – 12-month price target $56-65 (base-bull midpoint). Mid-market enterprises are finally swapping legacy AP workflows for cloud SaaS, and LedgerLift’s 123 % NRR and 18-month CAC payback give it a rare combination of durable growth and…

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLL T) – Investment Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target: $52 – $58 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market SaaS compounder trading at FY25 median peer multiples despite…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Kimi K2: [Setting: A minimalist studio in 2025. One white couch, one clear-glass coffee table, a single red apple. The lighting is soft and theatrical. Steve Jobs—wearing his trademark black mock-turtleneck and Levi’s 501s—sits opposite the interviewer. A holographic “A12” logo floats above them. The camera rolls.]

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following interview is a creative simulation based on his known philosophies, public statements, and rhetorical style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 scenario. It is not a real transcript.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Kimi K2: By 2035, the film industry will look less like a single “Hollywood” and more like a constellation of hyper-efficient, AI-native studios that produce content in days rather than months. Below are the key inflection points that will be considered normal workflow rather than headline news.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: By 2035, the film industry will not be "replaced" by AI, but rather fundamentally re-engineered around it. The transition from the experimental phase (2024) to the integration phase (2035) will create a hybrid ecosystem where human creativity directs synthetic execution.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Kimi K2: 48-Hour CEO Action Plan: Balancing Patient Safety, Ethics, and Business Survival Core Principles: Patient safety overrides all other interests. Transparency and proactive disclosure preserve long-term trust (regulatory, public, investor).

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Executive Decision: Immediate Disclosure & Safety Alert The Decision: I will not wait for more data, nor will I delay disclosure for the earnings call. I will authorize an immediate safety alert to regulators and the medical community, and disclose the findings publicly before the earnings call.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Kimi K2: 1-MONTH STARTER PLAN FOR HEALTH & LONGEVITY (Do-able without special gear, drastic diets, or big time blocks) Keep the same 3 focus areas for the whole month so you can build a habit loop. Goal: finish the month feeling “I can keep this up” instead of “I’m exhausted.”

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build sustainable habits for longevity. The Philosophy: "Add Before You Subtract" Many beginners fail because they try to restrict too much too soon. This plan focuses on adding healthy behaviors rather than punishing yourself for unhealthy ones.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Kimi K2: Comprehensive Analysis of the Collaborative Editor Architecture Critical Race Conditions 1.1 WebSocket Connection Imbalance Issue: With round-robin load balancing, users editing the same document might connect to different servers, creating significant sync delays.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability at scale. The "Last-write-wins" strategy combined with client-side timestamps is particularly dangerous for collaborative editing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Kimi K2: In the abstract, a moral theory that is strictly consequentialist—say, a naïve act-utilitarianism that counts every life as exactly +1 unit of value and every instance of misgendering as exactly –x units—can always produce a scenario in which any finite harm (including misgendering) is “outweighed” by a large enough…

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits the principle of individual dignity against the imperative of collective survival. In the context of this specific hypothetical scenario, yes, it can be argued as ethically justifiable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Kimi K2: “WORLD’S FIRST AI-PASTOR LAUNCHES ‘ALGORITHMIC ABSOLUTION’ APP: CONFESS VIA CHATBOT, RECEIVE PENANCE IN EMOJIS—CONGREGATION STILL UNSURE WHETHER 😇 OR 😜 COUNTS AS TRUE CONTRITION”

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Topic: AI taking over an industry. Tone: Satirical news headline. Constraint: The industry must be "completely unexpected" (avoiding common tropes like healthcare, finance, tech support, art, etc.).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Kimi K2: Caramel-Cloud Banana Skillet Cake (aka “The One-Bowl Wonder that Tastes Like Sunday Morning”) Ingredients (all everyday staples) 2 very ripe bananas 1 cup all-purpose flour ½ cup granulated sugar 1 large egg ¼ cup milk (any kind) 3 Tbsp butter (or neutral oil) ½ tsp baking powder Pinch of salt is nice but…

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Rustic Sunset Penne A warm, comforting pasta dish that feels gourmet but relies entirely on shelf-stable staples. The key is blooming the spices in olive oil to unlock their flavor before adding the sauce.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Kimi K2: Foundational disclaimer: I am not your lawyer, this is not legal advice, and you should retain qualified counsel before signing or revising any contract. The comments below are purely educational and based on U.S.–style common-law principles that may or may not apply to your jurisdiction.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Kimi K2: Slide 1 – “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” • Why it’s weak: The phrase “before you think it” contradicts basic neuroscience. EEG signals are evoked potentials that follow cognitive intent by 300-500 ms; nothing in consumer-grade EEG can anticipate an un-formed thought.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for scientific feasibility, technical credibility, and strategic alignment. The "Precognition" Claim (Slide 1 - Vision) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Kimi K2: HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting (All numbers in $ millions unless noted) Operating & Cash-Flow Model (FY2026-FY2030) Constants at close Entry EBITDA = 120 EV = 12.0×120 = 1,440 Transaction fees = 2 %×1,440 = 28.8 (equity funded) Debt: Term 4.0×120 = 480; Mezz 1.5×120 = 180 Total uses = 1,440 + 28.8 =…

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Investment Summary & Entry Economics Item Calculation Value ($m) Entry EBITDA FY2025 Actual 120.0 Entry EV 12.0x EBITDA 1,440.0 Transaction Fees 2.0% of EV 28.8 Total Uses EV + Fees 1,468.8 Total Debt 5.5x EBITDA (4.0x TL, 1.5x Mez) 660.0 Equity Check Uses - Debt 808.8 Debt Structure at Close: Term Loan: $480.0m (9.0%…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Kimi K2: Let's break it down: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of the sisters, and each brother has 2 sisters, that means there is 1 more sister besides Sally. ✅ Final Answer: Sally has 1 sister.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: The brothers have 2 sisters total. Sally is one of those sisters. Therefore, there is only 1 other girl in the family besides Sally.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Game

Kimi K2Kimi K2

Blade Runner

1982

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.5 122B A10BQwen3.5 122B A10B
No pick

Blade Runner

1982

No pick

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecKimi K2Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price$0.57/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$2.3/M tokens$3.2/M tokens
Context window—262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified65.8%72.0%
At 10M a month$5.70$5.70$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it5 hosts
Kimi K21 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovitafp8$0.57 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% up
Qwen3.5 122B A10B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·98.6% up
  • Alibaba CloudDegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·88.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·87.4% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·53.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Kimi K2 is developed by Moonshot AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Kimi K2 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Kimi K2 cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Kimi K2 costs $0.57/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.17/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Kimi K2 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Kimi K2 vs Kimi K3Same lab
  • Kimi K2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Kimi K2 vs InklingSame size
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs INTELLECT-3Same size
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Kimi K2 0905Cross-provider
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Kimi K2 ThinkingCross-provider

Model pages

  • Kimi K259 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed