Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 405B
Compare Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 7 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct or Llama 3.1 405B?
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct and Llama 3.1 405B are both competitive models. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B. Context windows: 1049K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct and Llama 3.1 405B
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is made by moonshotai while Llama 3.1 405B is from meta. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has a 1049K token context window compared to Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. On pricing, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 5.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct uses 524.8x more bold
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
