Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. LFM2.5-2.6BvsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Updated Sep 2026

LFM2.5-2.6BvsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) has a larger context window than LFM2.5-2.6B (262K tokens vs 128K tokens).

LFM2.5-2.6B and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecLFM2.5-2.6BNex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input priceFreeFree
Output priceFreeFree
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)Yes (1 provider)
ReleasedAug 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

LFM2.5-2.6B189 words
Dish Name: Sun-Kissed Spice Pasta Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Staples): Pasta (any shape, such as spaghetti or penne) Canned tomatoes (crushed or diced) Onion Garlic Olive oil Salt Red chili flakes (or red pepper flakes) Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes Instructions: Boil the Pasta…
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)119 words
Pantry Moon Bars A sweet, chewy peanut butter–chocolate oat treat made with only 7 pantry staples. Ingredients Rolled oats Creamy peanut butter Honey Chocolate chips Vanilla extract Ground cinnamon Salt Instructions Heat oven to 350°F / 175°C. Line an 8-inch square pan with parchment paper.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

LFM2.5-2.6B2,109 words
Contract Analysis: Risks and Recommended Modifications Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the Software Consulting Agreement, identifying potential exposure for the Contractor and suggesting specific modifications. SCOPE Clause Text: "Contractor shall provide software development services as directed by Client.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,451 words
Below is a general contract-risk review, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, contractor classification, and the exact facts. Also, even if a clause might be unenforceable, relying on that is risky because litigation/arbitration is expensive.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

LFM2.5-2.6B992 words
Dish Name: Echoes of the Abyss Concept: A deconstructed narrative of the ocean meeting the earth. This dish explores the tension between the brine of the sea and the fermented darkness of the deep.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1,665 words
Dish: “Tidewater Orchard” Langoustine · Mirabelle Plum · Juniper · Kombu · Rye A tasting-menu course built around an unusual pairing: sweet cold-water langoustine with mirabelle plum, bridged by kombu umami, juniper resin, green tomato acidity, and toasted rye bitterness.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

LFM2.5-2.6B1,022 words
Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks WebSocket Connection Loss and Cleanup Failure Mode: If a client disconnects unexpectedly (e.g., network failure), the server may retain a stale reference, leading to memory leaks or stale broadcast attempts.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)3,042 words
Executive summary The biggest correctness risks are: Client-clock last-write-wins is unsafe: clock skew, malicious clients, ties, and out-of-order delivery can silently lose edits.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

LFM2.5-2.6B1,719 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Failure Safety Issue Executive Summary This is a high-stakes crisis requiring immediate, decisive action that balances patient safety, legal compliance, financial responsibility, and ethical leadership.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,359 words
As CEO, I would not wait six months and I would not let the board delay disclosure while patients remain exposed to an unreported serious risk. I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and trust crisis—not merely a financial-risk issue. My guiding decisions would be: Patient safety comes first.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

LFM2.5-2.6B717 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they are problematic and how to fix them. The "Predict Before You Think" Claim (Slide 1) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)593 words
The 3 weakest claims are the ones most likely to be challenged in diligence: Weakest claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1. “94% accuracy… works with any language, any device.” This is the biggest scientific and product credibility risk.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
LFM2.5-2.6B
LFM2.5-2.6BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

LFM2.5-2.6B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

2 hosts

LFM2.5-2.6B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Liquid AIfp8$0 in·$0 out·66k·99.9% up
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIfp8degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI while Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is developed by Nex AGI. LFM2.5-2.6B has a 128K token context window vs Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. LFM2.5-2.6B and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0/M input tokens and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of LFM2.5-2.6B and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

LFM2.5-2.6B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoHy3 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGLM 5.3 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

LFM2.5-2.6B logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Granite 4.2 8BSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoNorth Mini Code logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini CodeSame size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoNex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)New provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalNew provider

Model pages

LFM2.5-2.6B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B56 outputs, specs and price
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)14 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed