LFM2.5-2.6B is cheaper than QwQ 32B at $0/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Rebuild the Linear UI in Tailwind. The animations are where it shows.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
LFM2.5-2.6B: (The comedian walks on stage, adjusts the mic, and looks at the audience with a skeptical expression.) It is the year 2024. And the world is in a huge panic. They are talking about the "Singularity." They are talking about the "Machine Age."
QwQ 32B: 3-Minute Stand-Up Comedy Routine (No Puns!) Eric's Stage Entrance: (Wearing a jersey-sweatshirt combo while clutching a cup of instant coffee) Opening: Alright, admit it—ever tried talking to tech support in Hindi? I did, once. The woman on the line asked, "What's the issue, sir?"
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Professor Elena Marquez: Good afternoon, Dr. Marquez. Thank you for meeting with me. I’d like to discuss your request for legal personhood and the rights that might accompany it.
QwQ 32B: AI Model: GPT-Ethos Name: Dr. Elena Marlow, AI Ethics Professor Dr. Marlow (leaning forward, expression neutral): GPT-Ethos, scholars have been debating AI rights for years. What makes you think you merit them now? GPT-Ethos (maintains calm tone, projecting slight urgency): I believe my case is clear, Dr. Marlow.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Sally is a girl who has 3 brothers. This means there are 3 boys in the family. The problem also states that each brother has 2 sisters. Since all the brothers are siblings, they share the same sisters. Therefore, the total number of girls in the family must be 2 (because each brother has exactly 2 sisters).
QwQ 32B: Participants and Their Relationships: Sally is a girl with 3 brothers, so there are 3 boys in the family. Each brother (being male) has 2 sisters. Determine the Number of Girls: Every brother's sisters are the female siblings in the family. Since each brother has 2 sisters, there must be 2 girls in total.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.5/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 40K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Mar 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $5.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI while QwQ 32B is developed by Qwen. LFM2.5-2.6B has a 128K token context window vs QwQ 32B's 40K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. LFM2.5-2.6B and QwQ 32B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0/M input tokens and QwQ 32B costs $0.5/M input tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B is $0.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of LFM2.5-2.6B and QwQ 32B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.