NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) has a larger context window than Llama 3.1 405B (262K tokens vs 128K tokens).
Sections that transition like Framer. Timing is the whole grade.
Which answer wins?
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2.7/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $3.1/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Parameters | 405B | 12B active (120B total) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $27.00 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Llama 3.1 405B is developed by Meta AI while NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) is developed by NVIDIA. Llama 3.1 405B has a 128K token context window vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Llama 3.1 405B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 405B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.