Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI against Qwen3 30B A3B by Qwen, in 2 community votes, qwen3 30b a3b wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 41K, tested across 5 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 2 blind community votes on Rival. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. Context windows: 128K vs 41K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3 30B A3B

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is made by meta while Qwen3 30B A3B is from qwen. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 41K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. In community voting, In 2 community votes, Qwen3 30B A3B wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 2 community votes, Qwen3 30B A3B wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3BWinner
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B. In 2 blind votes, Qwen3 30B A3B wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Qwen3 30B A3B
FAQ