Llama 4 ScoutvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Llama 4 Scout at $0.071/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.5/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 10.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Scout
Input
$0.25
Output
$0.50
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
3.5× cheaper
Output
$0.28
1.8× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 3.5× input, 1.8× output.
Where to run it
4 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 89.3x more emoji
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
50%Vocabulary52%
28wSentence Length15w
0.48Hedging0.20
2.9Bold7.0
4.4Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.89
0.26Headings0.91
0.05Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Llama 4 Scout vs Ling 2.6 FlashNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 3 70BCross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 3.1 405BCross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Cross-provider