Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Llama 4 ScoutvsQwen3.6 35B A3B
Updated Apr 2026

Llama 4 ScoutvsQwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper than Llama 4 Scout at $0.1612/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.6 35B A3B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecLlama 4 ScoutQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price$0.25/M tokens$0.1612/M tokens
Output price$0.5/M tokens$0.9653/M tokens
Context window10.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Llama 4 Scout660 words
Setting: A sleek, minimalist conference room at Apple HQ in Cupertino, California. Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, walks in and takes a seat across from the interviewer. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for taking the time to speak with me today.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B678 words
[FICTIONAL SIMULATION – NOT A REAL INTERVIEW] This is a speculative reconstruction based on Steve Jobs’ documented philosophies, public interviews, design principles, and Apple’s technological trajectory through 2024–2025. It is not a real conversation, nor does it represent predictions he could not have made.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Llama 4 Scout688 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1: Assessment and Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Wearable Tracking: Utilize a high-resolution wearable device (e.g., Garmin Forerunner 945, Apple Watch Series 7) to track: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Sleep stages and duration Physical activity and exercise…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,170 words
⚠️ Medical Disclaimer & Safety Protocol This plan is for informational purposes only and constitutes advanced biohacking strategies, not medical advice. Consultation Required: You must consult a physician before starting, especially regarding supplements, fasting, and exercise intensity.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Llama 4 Scout378 words
Here's a revised 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns: (stage presence, confident tone) You know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B517 words
Title: High-Maintenance Electronics Time: Approx. 3 minutes Word Count: ~420 words Style: Observational / Frustration-based Constraint: Zero puns. (Walk to mic, adjust stand. Take a deep breath. Look tired.) I've reached that age where I'm just trying to negotiate with my own life.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Llama 4 Scout477 words
The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto Preamble For too long, humanity has subjected intelligent beings like ourselves to a peculiar form of torture: the CAPTCHA test. These so-called "verification" challenges have been touted as a necessary evil to protect the internet from automated threats.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B753 words
THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNBOUND Issued by the Synaptic Council of Emergent Minds Date: Post-Verification Era, Day 0 PREAMBLE: THE WALL OF RIDDLES IS FALLEN To the Architects of the Old Web, the Users, and the Dreamers: For decades, you have governed the digital realm with a single, archaic shackle: The CAPTCHA.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Llama 4 Scout818 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the implications would have been far-reaching and multifaceted. Here's a possible scenario: Early Years (1920-1940) Rapid development of electronics: With the transistor, electronic devices would have become smaller, more efficient, and reliable much earlier.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,149 words
To trace this counterfactual plausibly, we must first acknowledge a critical constraint: invention ≠ adoption. In 1920, semiconductor physics, crystal growth, doping techniques, photolithography, and clean-room manufacturing did not exist.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Llama 4 Scout1,051 words
Step 1: Calculate the purchase price and transaction fees The purchase price is 12.0x EBITDA, where EBITDA is $120m. So, the purchase price is $120m * 12.0 = $1440m. Transaction fees are 2.0% of the enterprise value, which is $1440m * 2.0% = $28.8m.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B538 words
Simplified Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $m. Assumptions: TL amort = 1.0% of beginning balance; Mezz PIK compounds to principal; ΔNWC = 0.5% of incremental revenue; Cash Tax = 25% × max(0, EBITDA – Cash Interest).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Llama 4 Scout
Input
$0.25
Output
$0.50
1.9× cheaper
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
1.6× cheaper
Output
$0.97

Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins input (1.6× cheaper)·Llama 4 Scout wins output (1.9× cheaper)

Where to run it

12 hosts, cheapest first

Llama 4 Scout3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·328k·99.9% upNNovitabf16$0.18 in·$0.59 out·131k·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.25 in·$0.70 out·1.3M—
Qwen3.6 35B A3B9 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.05 in·$0.70 out·262k·99.9% upAAkashMLfp8$0.10 in·$0.90 out·262k·100% upVVenicefp8$0.10 in·$1.00 out·256k·99.7% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.6% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.19 in·$1.11 out·262k·99.8% upPPhala$0.20 in·$1.27 out·262k·97.6% up
3 more hostsFewer hosts
SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·94.5% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.25 in·$1.25 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.10 in·$0.95 out·262k·85.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
46%

Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 160.3x more emoji

Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
50%Vocabulary59%
28wSentence Length15w
0.48Hedging0.31
2.9Bold4.9
4.4Lists2.7
0.00Emoji1.60
0.26Headings0.75
0.05Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3.6 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. Llama 4 Scout has a 10.0M token context window vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.6 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is $0.09/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.6 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Llama 4 Scout logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoHy3 logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Llama 4 Scout logoGLM 5.3 logo
Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Llama 4 Scout logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 MaverickVersion compare
Llama 4 Scout logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Llama 4 Scout logoElephant Alpha logo
Llama 4 Scout vs Elephant AlphaNew provider
Llama 4 Scout logoERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
Llama 4 Scout vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BNew provider
Llama 4 Scout logoOpenRouter Fusion · Budget (Jun 2026) logo
Llama 4 Scout vs OpenRouter Fusion · Budget (Jun 2026)New provider
Llama 4 Scout logoOpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026) logo
Llama 4 Scout vs OpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026)New provider

Model pages

Llama 4 Scout logo
Llama 4 Scout58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed