Quasar Alpha has a larger context window than Mercury 2.5 (1.0M tokens vs 260K tokens).
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.04/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $0.15/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 260K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | — |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $0.40 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Mercury 2.5 is developed by Inception while Quasar Alpha is developed by OpenRouter. Mercury 2.5 has a 260K token context window vs Quasar Alpha's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 6 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mercury 2.5 and Quasar Alpha each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 6 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2.5 and Quasar Alpha across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.