Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare Inception: Mercury 2 by Inception against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Inception: Mercury 2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Inception: Mercury 2
Input
$0.25
Output
$0.75
2.0× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
1.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins input (1.7× cheaper)·Inception: Mercury 2 wins output (2.0× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
53%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 7.2x more emoji
Inception: Mercury 2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
53%Vocabulary52%
22wSentence Length16w
0.40Hedging0.20
6.6Bold5.8
2.6Lists3.7
0.08Emoji0.59
0.87Headings0.96
0.14Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
