Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Mercury 2vsQwen3.8 Flash
Updated Aug 2026

Mercury 2vsQwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper than Mercury 2 at $0.15/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Mercury 2 and Qwen3.8 Flash compared across 8 shared prompts
SpecMercury 2Qwen3.8 Flash
Input price$0.25/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$0.75/M tokens$0.47/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 8 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Mercury 2291 words
Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Flash147 words
Moon Halo Cookies A soft, golden sugar cookie with crisp edges and a tender center—made with just 7 pantry staples. Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 20 minutes Makes: About 16 cookies Ingredients 1/2 cup butter, softened 3/4 cup sugar 1 egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract 1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Mercury 2920 words
One‑Month “Kick‑Start” Blueprint for Health & Longevity Pick three pillars – Nutrition, Movement, Sleep – and build daily habits that are easy to start, track, and keep.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Flash368 words
1-Month Beginner Health & Longevity Plan Focus areas: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep Week 1: Build the basics Nutrition Add 1 serving of vegetables to 2 meals per day. Drink water with each meal. Choose protein at most meals: eggs, beans, tofu, chicken, fish, yogurt. Movement Walk 10–15 minutes daily.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Mercury 2896 words
1. Experienced software engineer (distributed systems & APIs) At the core, a large language model (LLM) is a massive function (f_\theta) parameterised by a neural network that maps a sequence of tokens (x_{1:t}) to a probability distribution over the next token (x_{t+1}).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Flash983 words
For an experienced software engineer Training a large language model is not “just” making it guess the next word in isolation. It is fitting an enormous parameterized function to predict the next token conditioned on all previous tokens in a sequence.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash
Mercury 2
Mercury 2Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mercury 2
Input
$0.25
Output
$0.75
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input
$0.15
1.7× cheaper
Output
$0.47
1.6× cheaper

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on both: 1.7× input, 1.6× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Mercury 21 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Inception$0.25 in·$0.75 out·128k·100% up
Qwen3.8 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$0.47 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Mercury 2 is developed by Inception while Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Qwen. Mercury 2 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 8 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Mercury 2 and Qwen3.8 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 8 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2 and Qwen3.8 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Mercury 2 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Mercury 2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Mercury 2 logoHy3 logo
Mercury 2 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Mercury 2 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Mercury 2 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Mercury 2 logoMercury logo
Mercury 2 vs MercuryVersion compare
Mercury 2 logoMercury 2.5 logo
Mercury 2 vs Mercury 2.5Same lab
Qwen3.8 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.8 Flash logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Mercury 2 logoMistral Large 3 2512 logo
Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 3 2512New provider
Mercury 2 logoMistral Medium 3 logo
Mercury 2 vs Mistral Medium 3New provider
Mercury 2 logoMistral Medium 3.1 logo
Mercury 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.1New provider
Mercury 2 logoMistral Nemo logo
Mercury 2 vs Mistral NemoNew provider

Model pages

Mercury 2 logo
Mercury 253 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Flash8 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed