Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MiMo-V2-OmnivsMiniMax M3
Updated Jun 2026

MiMo-V2-OmnivsMiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 is cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni at $0.3/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax M3 compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax M3
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Jun 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 52 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

MiMo-V2-Omni559 words
1) Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–2030) Line Item FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972.0 $1,040.0 $1,102.5 $1,157.6 $1,215.5 EBITDA $136.1 $156.0 $176.4 $191.0 $206.6 EBITDA Margin 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 16.5% 17.0% Cash Interest - TL $43.2 $42.8 $42.3 $41.9 $41.5 Cash Interest - Mezz $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3553 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5-Year LBO Analysis Sources & Uses at Close (FY2025) Sources $m Uses $m Term Loan (4.0x) 480.0 Purchase price (12.0x × $120) 1,440.0 Mezzanine (1.5x) 180.0 Transaction fees (2.0% × EV) 28.8 Sponsor Equity (plug) 808.8 Total 1,468.8 Total 1,468.8 Initial Mezz: $180m; Initial TL: $480m.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

MiMo-V2-Omni437 words
By 2035, AI is likely to transform the film industry in profound ways—reshaping creativity, production, and even the very idea of “performance.” Here’s how that could unfold across the three areas you mentioned: Deepfakes & Visual Effects Seamless de-aging & resurrection: Actors could be digitally “reborn” at any…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3748 words
AI and the Future of Cinema: A 2035 Outlook By 2035, AI will likely have reshaped nearly every stage of filmmaking—but probably not in the way either techno-optimists or doomsayers expect. The transformation will be uneven, with some functions transformed entirely while others remain stubbornly human.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

MiMo-V2-Omni1,005 words
Excellent question. This is a profound counterfactual that would rewrite the 20th century. Let's trace the implications, keeping in mind that the transistor's invention wasn't just a new device—it was the key that unlocked the information age. An earlier start accelerates everything built upon it.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M32,628 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Speculative History Through 1980 A Necessary Caveat Before diving in: quantum mechanics didn't exist in 1920. The "holes," band theory, and doping concepts that made the actual transistor possible weren't formulated until 1928-1931 (Bloch, Wilson, Heisenberg).
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

MiMo-V2-Omni815 words
"Moonlit Tidal Pool" A Meditation on the Sea at Night Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space where the ocean meets the shore under moonlight—capturing the briny depth of the sea, the mineral whisper of tidal rocks, and the ephemeral glow of bioluminescence.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M31,795 words
TIDES OF THE FOREST Mareas del Bosque — A dish for the table of four THE NARRATIVE Where the salt forest breathes. This dish was conceived as a poem about collision — a memory of two landscapes that should not exist in the same breath: the pine-dark density of a Boreal forest floor at dawn, and the crystalline hush of…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

MiMo-V2-Omni224 words
Pirate: Arr, these AI models be like buried treasure maps! They take all the world's gold—err, data—and learn where to dig. But ye still need a clever cap'n to steer the ship! Knight: By my oath, 'tis as if a squire studied every tome in the kingdom to advise the court.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3368 words
AI Council of the Ages Pirate: Arrr, so ye be tellin' me this "artificial intelligence" be a wee mechanical parrot that learns to talk like a sea dog? Squawks out answers without ever settin' foot on the seven seas? Hacker: Not quite, matey.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

MiMo-V2-Omni365 words
To estimate the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we start with the model's key specifications: it has 175 billion parameters and was trained on approximately 300 billion tokens. The calculation involves breaking down the FLOPs for the forward and backward passes during training.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3379 words
Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs Step 1: Identify the Key Parameters From what's publicly known about GPT-3 (175B parameter version): Number of non-embedding parameters: N ≈ 175 × 10⁹ Training tokens: D ≈ 300 × 10⁹ (the paper used a ~570GB filtered corpus processed into ~300B tokens) Step 2: Derive the FLOPs-per-Token…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3
MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-OmniRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiniMax M3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00
MiniMax M3
Input
$0.30
1.3× cheaper
Output
$1.20
1.7× cheaper

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on both: 1.3× input, 1.7× output.

Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

MiMo-V2-Omni

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

MiniMax M313 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
CCoreWeavefp4$0.23 in·$0.96 out·262k·99.8% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.24 in·$0.96 out·1M·99.7% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.28 in·$1.10 out·524k·98.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99.4% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·99.4% up
7 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·98.2% upSStreamLakefp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·98.9% upTTogether$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99.7% upVVenicefp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·97.2% upMMara$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·90.7% upSSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·95.7% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$3.00 out·1M·99% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
55%

MiniMax M3 uses 4.5x more emoji

MiMo-V2-Omni
MiniMax M3
59%Vocabulary55%
23wSentence Length24w
0.72Hedging0.52
7.2Bold5.2
3.6Lists3.0
0.26Emoji1.15
1.25Headings1.21
0.10Transitions0.02
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

MiMo-V2-Omni logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
MiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
MiniMax M3 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoHy4 Preview logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
MiniMax M3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
MiniMax M3 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.5 logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.5Same lab
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.5-Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.5-ProSame lab
MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.7Version compare
MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.5Version compare
MiMo-V2-Omni logoLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Same size
MiniMax M3 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
MiniMax M3 logoLlama 4 Scout logo
MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMercury logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MercuryNew provider

Model pages

MiMo-V2-Omni logo
MiMo-V2-Omni53 outputs, specs and price
MiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M357 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed