MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
1.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
1.7× cheaper
Output
$3.60
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins input (1.7× cheaper)·MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins output (1.2× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
44%
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 7.0x more transitions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
58%Vocabulary54%
22wSentence Length14w
0.61Hedging0.39
5.7Bold6.9
3.1Lists4.2
0.63Emoji0.23
1.40Headings0.93
0.02Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
