MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Compare MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi against Qwen: Qwen3 Max by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 256K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen: Qwen3 Max
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiMo-V2.5 is 3.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5
Input
$0.40
3.0× cheaper
Output
$2.00
3.0× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 3.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
69%
Qwen: Qwen3 Max uses 2.7x more transitions
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen: Qwen3 Max
57%Vocabulary60%
17wSentence Length28w
0.64Hedging0.48
5.9Bold5.7
2.8Lists4.1
1.01Emoji0.45
1.07Headings0.78
0.07Transitions0.18
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
